RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP

["Jim Pinkerton" <[e-mail]>]

Will do. Sorry, in my quick reply I did not mean to imply I was going to
ignore the other feedback.


Jim



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:36 AM
> To: Jim Pinkerton; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Please make sure that the additional editorial updates
> that were sent directly are dealt with and that the draft
> is checked against the ID Checklist before submitting.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Pinkerton [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 12:26 PM
> > To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
> >
> >
> > I'll resubmit the draft with the text removed immediately after the
> > black-out period.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > [e-mail]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:00 AM
> > > To: [e-mail]
> > > Subject: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
> > >
> > > The WG Last Call period on these documents has concluded.
> > > I have seen no technical issues raised on the mailing
> > > list, and hence these drafts have passed WG Last Call.
> > >
> > > I have sent a number of editorial comments to the
> > > authors.  The only one that approaches being technical is
> > > that the following sentence in Section 4.1 of the security
> > > draft needs to be removed:
> > >
> > > 	"If a specific implementation does not wish to address
> > > 	security issues resolved by the Resource Manager, there
> > > 	may in fact be no resource manager at all."
> > >
> > > This needs to be removed because the Privileged Resource
> > > Manager and some of its security functionality are mandatory-
> > > -to-implement, even if the PRM need not be realized as a
> > > separately identifiable implementation component.  There is
> > > text elsewhere in the security draft, as well as in both
> > > the DDP and RDMAP drafts saying that the Privileged Resource
> > > Manager is mandatory functionality.
> > >
> > > Draft authors should plan to prepare revised drafts during
> > > March, including checking the revised versions against the
> > > ID (nits) checklist:  http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html
> > >
> > > I'd like to have revised drafts ready to be sent to the ADs
> > > & the IESG by the end of March, please.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --David
> > >
> > > > This is the message you've all been waiting for ...
> > > >
> > > > It is my pleasure to (finally!) announce the RDDP Working
> > > > Group Last Call on the following three drafts:
> > > >
> > > > DDP/RDMAP Security
> > > > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-security-06.txt)
> > > > Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports
> > > > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-04.txt)
> > > > An RDMA Protocol Specification
> > > > 	(draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-03.txt)
> > > >
> > > > This WG Last Call will run until 11:59pm Eastern Time
> > > > (US) on Monday, February 28th.  That should give the
> > > > draft authors and WG chair the rest of that week to
> > > > organize any Last Call issues that need attention at
> > > > the Minneapolis IETF meeting the following week.  An
> > > > hour of meeting time has been requested in Minneapolis,
> > > > but may be released if there's nothing to discuss.
> > > >
> > > > Technical comments need to be posted to this mailing list.
> > > > Editorial comments may be sent directly to the primary
> > > > draft authors:
> > > >
> > > > - Security: Jim Pinkerton <jpink -at- windows.microsoft.com>
> > > > - DDP: Hemal Shah <hemal.shah -at- intel.com>
> > > > - RDMAP: Renato J. Recio <recio -at- us.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > Please copy me (as WG chair - David Black <black_david -at-
> > > > emc.com>) on any editorial comments, just in case something
> > > > initially thought to be editorial turns out to have technical
> > > > content.
> > > >
> > > > There are other drafts linked to the WG's web page:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/rddp-charter.html
> > > >
> > > > that may be of interest or relevance in reviewing the three
> > > > drafts for this WG Last Call.
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks to all whose hard work has gotten us this far,
> > > > --David (RDDP WG chair)
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> > > > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> > > > [phone]             FAX: [phone]
> > > > [e-mail]        Mobile: [phone]
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rddp mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rddp mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> >

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp