RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
"Jim Pinkerton" <jpink@windows.microsoft.com> Wed, 02 March 2005 17:28 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06891 for <rddp-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:28:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6XfI-0006BL-QG for rddp-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:29:41 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6Xc6-0007nc-IB; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:26:22 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6Xc4-0007nU-GN for rddp@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:26:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06704 for <rddp@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:26:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail1.microsoft.com ([131.107.3.125]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6XdG-00068h-EA for rddp@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:27:34 -0500
Received: from mailout1.microsoft.com ([157.54.1.117]) by mail1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1802); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:26:10 -0800
Received: from red-hub-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.100]) by mailout1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1802); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:26:09 -0800
Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.84]) by red-hub-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:26:09 -0800
Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.81]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1802); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:26:10 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:26:12 -0800
Message-ID: <E6564B8F86852D46A4E98C485FB33B8F0C75BE76@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP
thread-index: AcUegMJWoAlo+zCjQP6Oshk0yiuACwAzCBRA
From: Jim Pinkerton <jpink@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Black_David@emc.com, rddp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2005 17:26:10.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[ECD477D0:01C51F4C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6d95a152022472c7d6cdf886a0424dc6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement \(rddp\) WG" <rddp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp>, <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rddp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp>, <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2857c5c041d6c02d7181d602c22822c8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'll resubmit the draft with the text removed immediately after the black-out period. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: rddp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Black_David@emc.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:00 AM > To: rddp@ietf.org > Subject: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, RDMAP > > The WG Last Call period on these documents has concluded. > I have seen no technical issues raised on the mailing > list, and hence these drafts have passed WG Last Call. > > I have sent a number of editorial comments to the > authors. The only one that approaches being technical is > that the following sentence in Section 4.1 of the security > draft needs to be removed: > > "If a specific implementation does not wish to address > security issues resolved by the Resource Manager, there > may in fact be no resource manager at all." > > This needs to be removed because the Privileged Resource > Manager and some of its security functionality are mandatory- > -to-implement, even if the PRM need not be realized as a > separately identifiable implementation component. There is > text elsewhere in the security draft, as well as in both > the DDP and RDMAP drafts saying that the Privileged Resource > Manager is mandatory functionality. > > Draft authors should plan to prepare revised drafts during > March, including checking the revised versions against the > ID (nits) checklist: http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html > > I'd like to have revised drafts ready to be sent to the ADs > & the IESG by the end of March, please. > > Thanks, > --David > > > This is the message you've all been waiting for ... > > > > It is my pleasure to (finally!) announce the RDDP Working > > Group Last Call on the following three drafts: > > > > DDP/RDMAP Security > > (draft-ietf-rddp-security-06.txt) > > Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports > > (draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-04.txt) > > An RDMA Protocol Specification > > (draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-03.txt) > > > > This WG Last Call will run until 11:59pm Eastern Time > > (US) on Monday, February 28th. That should give the > > draft authors and WG chair the rest of that week to > > organize any Last Call issues that need attention at > > the Minneapolis IETF meeting the following week. An > > hour of meeting time has been requested in Minneapolis, > > but may be released if there's nothing to discuss. > > > > Technical comments need to be posted to this mailing list. > > Editorial comments may be sent directly to the primary > > draft authors: > > > > - Security: Jim Pinkerton <jpink -at- windows.microsoft.com> > > - DDP: Hemal Shah <hemal.shah -at- intel.com> > > - RDMAP: Renato J. Recio <recio -at- us.ibm.com> > > > > Please copy me (as WG chair - David Black <black_david -at- > > emc.com>) on any editorial comments, just in case something > > initially thought to be editorial turns out to have technical > > content. > > > > There are other drafts linked to the WG's web page: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/rddp-charter.html > > > > that may be of interest or relevance in reviewing the three > > drafts for this WG Last Call. > > > > Many thanks to all whose hard work has gotten us this far, > > --David (RDDP WG chair) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rddp mailing list > > rddp@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp > > > > _______________________________________________ > rddp mailing list > rddp@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
- [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, DDP, … Black_David
- RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, D… Jim Pinkerton
- RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, D… Black_David
- RE: [rddp] WG Last Call *Concluded*l: Security, D… Jim Pinkerton