Re: [re-ECN] [conex] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion Exposure (conex)

Hi,

When we moved discussion from the BRIDGE MIB WG to an IEEE ML, we
automated the WG ML to respond to posters with a message that
discusion should be taken to <IEEE-ML>, and here are the instructions
for joining that list. 

I recommend a similar approach here.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: conex-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:conex-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Bob Briscoe
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 7:49 AM
> To: conex@ietf.org
> Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org list; conex@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [conex] [re-ECN] Fwd: WG Action: Congestion 
> Exposure (conex)
> 
> Lars,
> 
> At 08:30 04/06/2010, Lars Eggert wrote:
> >I leave it up to Bob to decide if he wants to keep the 
> >re-ecn@ietf.org list around; but any CONEX-related discussion
should 
> >move to conex@ietf.org.
> 
> Unless anyone objects, I intend to shut down the re-ECN list (in a 
> few days once traffic in response to ongoing threads has died).
> 
> If there starts to be too much discussion on re-ECN details that are

> beyond the ConEx charter, I'm sure the chairs will let those 
> responsible know, then we can consider reopening a separate re-ECN 
> list. But I don't think we'll get to that bridge and we can 
> cross it if we do.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> conex mailing list
> conex@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex
> 