IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer Document Track

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pm@dotandco.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2183A0C59 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dotandco.com header.b=gi5OZWPR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=KOwORpsf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDmY4TGILMC4 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE9C3A0CB3 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A00F5C00BA for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:07:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap22 ([10.202.2.72]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:07:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dotandco.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm3; bh=hkJuK MHEca6RHs/Hrrf004YpTjKDDzoKS24hkJZTB6s=; b=gi5OZWPRAHZ7/AnSQ70fb ZxoDlqVr1lTcQrkosMVWdalyDoWYbGTiiJsqBkXlUkWgE7nS7Tmx6W8/gg7wjn/w 0rnEYjZQ3CQ4jhFXxmVXzk6IogYIVCMK7E/ZPy49kRoK0xbF/dtMW4cErbxTtSy5 FwYYVriRA8nJQi+PxcsEczvteD6d5vMrAVpwiTcjEj61XqA7ZcZKhNkA3N1+UL6q KfMJNJckdScLfvaLvxgEewKjuNAoZXWBr9PicmXrJzGQv2RxyF2XaqqBzfEp8MDr RwsPh0CMbhPYAtxszJMng03pHJb/VPHeQx1soaaobwOA2kly9eZJ/TOzCW14866u Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=hkJuKMHEca6RHs/Hrrf004YpTjKDDzoKS24hkJZTB 6s=; b=KOwORpsfu1kl4ZXOUCMaC0CY0dTmjUy7OBUeZFXQs1Ocsy/sm1M2a/M3J 2ExOT+FTngCI68gtcjJeCvMRq7mCQ8meKScPZnpaRvGQuRNinMVXttIFpy8snZCb jQb82cmJSU/FuITpkLs+tuBX3O+RxRV6y2Hens414yjgiLaNpbgixZBnsi09sjln A7TaJvF7hKP2poPm3H0Vezvvps5ycHAOSGxWEEN5aTjH7GAwfad+9OSubra1+tfN pCuy5SSKtMxhWPPZ4ZefNIrIgzshzeqsgTZgyAE5JdCDwEt7+pDDMiUFK8OwRQkL SDu/WEt2AWPsSrqX6Wc1SaCjc37OA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2RlZX8W2x9PScj_pb0fXft3qzYj2fxHduCcNmBbigtmhldCtdVFfCsQXDlo> <xme:2RlZXwnszzVuWX4gAc0gbQcQh_BsnbCsmJKKslQrQ8piZy38Qg-rT_DOnUCE7dmgS KJ4mjHvGFv-LWzHAQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehhedguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgse htqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgrthhrihgtkhcuofgvvhiivghkfdcuoehpmhes ughothgrnhgutghordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffgeelvefhleekudfgie eijeffudduhfeghfeljedvteefudegudefhffftdefveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpmhesughothgrnhgutghordgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2RlZXwbuQxXy3dxRIWA7OyNT13ddwdOXI8ti46hgyVaMiW2NOG7gLA> <xmx:2RlZX7UoMfyYrPzkMas2XpaxbssrbfXWNbaZ-Znz7aYy3rwTR9F6Iw> <xmx:2RlZX2m3oEQ6KJAEWoz1yiYolxoqyqoYXYecFiJ8oTrndvKhtG0IcA> <xmx:2RlZXyxVDKlF_xxQFXHr8wXtph5kvcA1rw2Pr3yT5q8CEErRLgKptg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id DD95B6680078; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-259-g88fbbfa-fm-20200903.003-g88fbbfa3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <13ab636f-1630-4173-b359-ef182145520b@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <086BAABE-36EB-449A-86B1-E68012BEBC2C@verisign.com>
References: <086BAABE-36EB-449A-86B1-E68012BEBC2C@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:06:26 -0500
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/8gtlqTngMp5bMz9qMG_OHgFdhIo>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer Document Track
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:07:30 -0000


On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 08:26, Gould, James wrote:
>  
> Both draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and 
> draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer are BCP drafts.  We have 
> discussed the status of these drafts informally at prior REGEXT 
> meetings and more formally at the IETF-108 REGEXT meeting.  Both drafts 
> don’t define protocol, but define operational practices of using the 
> existing EPP RFCs in a more secure or more compliant way.  I believe 
> the drafts best match the purpose of a BCP.  Please respond on the list 
> with your support for the BCP track or if you believe a different track 
> should be used for one or both drafts.  

I believe they both should be "Experimental" instead.

They are not long term widespread "current practices" at all.

As for "best" ones, I am still reserved.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  pm@dotandco.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email