[regext] Re: holding on a working group adoption

[Scott Hollenbeck <[e-mail]>]

Jim, I don't think it's the case that draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp is waiting for anything. The shepherd write-up is there, and the draft was updated to address the one thing that Gavin found.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Galvin <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 10:30 AM
> To: REGEXT WG <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [regext] Re: holding on a working group adoption
> 
> Many thanks to Suhale for completing his first Shepherd write-up for
> “RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)”.  He did an excellent
> job.
> 
> The Chairs have reviewed the write-up, accept it, and have now submitted
> this document to the IESG for consideration.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension/
> RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)
> 
> 
> Having moved that document off our milestone list, the REGEXT working
> group can now consider adopting its candidate.  That candidate will be:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis/
> Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning
> Protocol (EPP)
> 
> Please watch for an adoption request to appear on the mailing list shortly.
> 
> 
> As an update, the following two documents are still waiting on a shepherd
> write-up or revised document before they can move forward to the IESG:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/
> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over QUIC
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/
> Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
> 
> 
> The following documents remain “Candidate for Working Group Adoption”,
> in this order, as soon as one of those documents moves forward:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galvin-regext-epp-variants/
> Domain Related Group Support for EPP
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-albanna-regext-eku-mtls-in-epp/
> Extended Key Usage and Mutual TLS in EPP
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jorge, Antoin, Jim
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 Apr 2026, at 10:38, James Galvin wrote:
> 
> > The Chairs want to let the working group that we have two pending
> requests for adoption and three documents waiting to be submitted to the
> IESG.
> >
> >
> > Our usual process has been that we do not adopt additional work until
> current work moves off our milestone list.  The documents waiting to move
> off our milestone list (waiting on Shepherd write-up or revised document)
> are as follows:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/
> > Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over QUIC
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/
> > Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension/
> > RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)
> >
> >
> > The next document that we will propose for adoption when one of these
> documents moves off our milestone list is:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis/
> > Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning
> Protocol (EPP)
> >
> > If anyone has any questions or concerns about this please do respond
> on the list and let us know, including if you would like to move forward with
> the adoption request sooner.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jorge, Antoin, and Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]