[regext] Re: holding on a working group adoption

[James Galvin <[e-mail]>]

I wanted to update the ordered list of documents waiting for adoption.  I missed adding Mario’s request.

The current order list of documents waiting for adoption is as follows:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galvin-regext-epp-variants/
Domain Related Group Support for EPP

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-verified-contacts/
Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Extension for Verified Contact Information

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-albanna-regext-eku-mtls-in-epp/
Extended Key Usage and Mutual TLS in EPP

Regards,

Jorge, Antoin, Jim


On 20 Apr 2026, at 10:30, James Galvin wrote:

> Many thanks to Suhale for completing his first Shepherd write-up for “RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)”.  He did an excellent job.
>
> The Chairs have reviewed the write-up, accept it, and have now submitted this document to the IESG for consideration.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension/
> RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)
>
>
> Having moved that document off our milestone list, the REGEXT working group can now consider adopting its candidate.  That candidate will be:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis/
> Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
>
> Please watch for an adoption request to appear on the mailing list shortly.
>
>
> As an update, the following two documents are still waiting on a shepherd write-up or revised document before they can move forward to the IESG:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/
> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over QUIC
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/
> Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
>
>
> The following documents remain “Candidate for Working Group Adoption”, in this order, as soon as one of those documents moves forward:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galvin-regext-epp-variants/
> Domain Related Group Support for EPP
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-albanna-regext-eku-mtls-in-epp/
> Extended Key Usage and Mutual TLS in EPP
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jorge, Antoin, Jim
>
>
>
> On 13 Apr 2026, at 10:38, James Galvin wrote:
>
>> The Chairs want to let the working group that we have two pending requests for adoption and three documents waiting to be submitted to the IESG.
>>
>>
>> Our usual process has been that we do not adopt additional work until current work moves off our milestone list.  The documents waiting to move off our milestone list (waiting on Shepherd write-up or revised document) are as follows:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-quic/
>> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport over QUIC
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/
>> Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ttl-extension/
>> RDAP Extension for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL Values)
>>
>>
>> The next document that we will propose for adoption when one of these documents moves off our milestone list is:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carney-regext-rfc3915bis/
>> Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
>>
>> If anyone has any questions or concerns about this please do respond on the list and let us know, including if you would like to move forward with the adoption request sooner.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jorge, Antoin, and Jim