Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption

"James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com> Fri, 21 December 2018 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92E12426A for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ammXbTIfnHpH for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B4A123FFD for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id p17so5917771qtl.5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JrSdDLVi4WtXdNpunL8+kgUx6pfOnOAGZ1o8hzymox0=; b=hpsb6zPSsprDdUxqXQ8SLXML8wlWkOi+6Zn3zrIdydoxjkvUauL0tBByYomPi+bHZN kCOyeHCzhKBE2CatFdEpe6VdPwWwg9C0OLmqUQH9+Pm0yr70S5MiSd9NCn94QIh0hT+V Vgv+68Lqj9D0nWNYkV5FamafWf1E8Xx8hTBSN+0mquL99DxQJEhYj5QKASwc6uxDlJwj C1xt4NnoxBNQGwogr5tbkEEiBEyayKAQ4jaYfpIGBsaOs5b0nUtCJxub4OXqS0+DaYRP /PC0vvTfmt8pdRlck0ySLXkul4MoOXQL7RO+JLcTiItDSPLI2+vaMP9eEgtRlfX/59uv VaDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JrSdDLVi4WtXdNpunL8+kgUx6pfOnOAGZ1o8hzymox0=; b=eBqV8ZBA3OJzHDNePaxn9cYe3eRuGZVX54uw6BZPUck/T9UEt/JcWNp5+BPWX70Yfn 18MolREcyK/6PCe6TjeoLiThqGIlyYCNgae8b2T/ZNuTCNfWyQ3nJnyqKQ/CPZQKJI+7 6fnqH4JwcNPFsUPherVN8Vnfz5+evil2o/BKuKhQmb6EsLVhOMUUXHexTKSNMXYTUWep BPRxjFSpEtg8+cn8Mn8fJdRVZfy1QsCAo72YDM71JFfQVfwzMmzydw6psjgbq9DLGN/m 0PiFfbVqqRuxr4htqwghPSM2oRWwWqx18lf69atFQVJIMNacoJnXmjA4VpBh2yfDwNds mvLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdlz0Y16ofuuZHlV7CDHz49Tm7TgPgkRjE3W1dYk90dwVtvF9tt KYHzF0tSNB7b3P4c8HS855nOfTtOzFc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5wg8/qm6geNyJ/5nVU/wUmf5B35356YopPFKPdp73bp4G5m6eoTEuhehjvcRW1jAvTQTENwg==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b301:: with SMTP id s1mr2646041qve.132.1545403949014; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.103] ([2601:154:c200:10:dc56:b98b:3606:d631]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm7870050qtq.20.2018.12.21.06.52.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:52:27 -0800 (PST)
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
To: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:52:28 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.3r5579)
Message-ID: <C860FD92-946C-4506-ABB8-A66EB2D05888@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <B92BABC8-7A92-499F-8854-DD392D2D75EC@verisign.com>
References: <554EAD7C-8664-450E-891F-704D45D60703@elistx.com> <84BC7E94-C3E2-4C65-977F-6C415E768EE9@elistx.com> <B92BABC8-7A92-499F-8854-DD392D2D75EC@verisign.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/AeGS3e5TVoAeBHlx-sjaSekb-9w>
Subject: Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:52:33 -0000

Thanks for this Jim.  I’ve removed IDN Table Mapping but I have a 
question for you.

If that document is tightly coupled with the “idnmap” document, why 
are you keeping it “active” (last updated two months ago) when the 
“idnmap” document is expired (3 years ago)?

Thanks,

Jim



On 10 Dec 2018, at 11:57, Gould, James wrote:

> Jim,
>
> The following is already a REGEXT working group document:
>
>     Verification Code
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode/
>
> The following can be moved to the ON HOLD PENDING EXTERNAL ACTIONS 
> list:
>
>     Login Security Policy (Extension of Registry Mapping)
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-login-security-policy/
>
> The following can be removed:
>
>     IDN Table Mapping - This draft would be needed if 
> draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap progressed as a working group document.
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-idn-table/
>
> —
>
> JG
>
>
>
> James Gould
> Distinguished Engineer
> jgould@Verisign.com
>
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
>
> On 12/10/18, 11:43 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" 
> <regext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of galvin@elistx.com> wrote:
>
>     Thanks to Scott, James, and Tobias.  The updated document list is
>     included below.
>
>
>     On 7 Dec 2018, at 9:38, James Galvin wrote:
>
>     > Included below is the list of potential documents and topics 
> this
>     > working group could adopt.  The first step in moving forward is 
> to
>     > make sure we have a complete list.  We are asking folks to 
> review this
>     > list and make sure we have not missed anything.  We are allowing 
> one
>     > week for this review, until Friday 14 December 2018.  During 
> this time
>     > please do ask questions about documents or topics.
>     >
>     > The next step will be for the working group members to indicate 
> their
>     > top 5 choices of documents to move forward.  Recall that 5 is 
> the
>     > maximum number of milestones suggested for us to have open at a 
> time.
>     > If there is discussion to be had about this number please start 
> a new
>     > email thread and we will see where it goes.
>     >
>     > We will do this with a Doodle poll.  Hopefully you are familiar 
> with
>     > this.  We will setup each document as a choice and you’ll be 
> asked
>     > to select up to 5 documents.  In Doodle, you can select Yes, No, 
> or
>     > IfNeedBe.  You can use the IfNeedBe option to indicate documents 
> that
>     > you support but not as your top 5.  We will open this Doodle 
> poll
>     > before the Christmas holiday and leave it open through Friday, 
> 11
>     > January.  That should be plenty of time to get past holiday and
>     > vacation time that many folks will have during this time.
>     >
>     > Once we have an ordered list of documents we will announce 
> working
>     > group adoption requests and we will move forward with our work.
>     > It’s going to be a busy year, 2019!
>
>     Registry Reporting Repository
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-registry-reporting-repo/
>
>     Registry Reporting Structure
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-registry-report-structure/
>
>     Domain Fee Report
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-fee-report/
>
>     Registry Transaction Report
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcpherson-sattler-ry-transaction-report/
>
>     Registry Domain Inventory Report
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-inventory-report/
>
>     Registry Domain Drop Report
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-domain-drop-report
>
>     Registry Unavailable Domain Report
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-registry-unavailable-domain-report/
>
>     Registry Maintenance Notifications
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance/
>
>     Unhandled Namespaces
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces
>
>     Data Set File Format
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-dataset/
>
>     Login Security
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-login-security/
>
>     Login Security Policy
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-login-security-policy/
>
>     Federated Authentication for RDAP
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-openid/
>
>     RDAP Partial Response
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-partial-response/
>
>     RDAP Search
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fregly-regext-rdap-search-regex/
>
>     RDAP Reverse Search
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
>
>     RDAP Sorting and Paging
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/
>
>     Registry Data Escrow Specification
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arias-noguchi-registry-data-escrow/
>
>     Domain Name Registration Data (DNRD) Objects Mapping
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arias-noguchi-dnrd-objects-mapping/
>
>     Third Party DNS Operator to Registrar/Registry
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol/
>
>     Verification Code
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode/
>
>     IDN Table Mapping
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-idn-table/
>
>
>     ON HOLD PENDING EXTERNAL ACTIONS
>
>     Launch Phase Policy
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-launch-policy/
>
>     Registry Mapping
>     https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gould-carney-regext-registry/
>
>
>     Antoin and Jim
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     regext mailing list
>     regext@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext