[regext] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-06: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 07 April 2020 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348023A0856; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 05:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, jgould@verisign.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.124.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <158626318319.2960.9925279355801330016@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 05:39:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Ber-LxLRYO8xHIGNFupJ6b_SN0Q>
Subject: [regext] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-06: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:39:43 -0000

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-06: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Section 8.

As this document will be an IETF proposed standard I think the registrant for
the RDE and XML schema shall follow the recommendation in RFC 3688:

   Registrant Contact
      The individual/organization that is the registration contact for
      the component being registered.  Ideally, this will be the name
      and pertinent physical and network contact information.  In the
      case of IETF developed standards, the Registrant will be the IESG.

So please change that registrant to follow the above. The purpose of this is to
prevent any issues over who has change control of the registered entries.