Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 05 September 2020 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7893A1182; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s1j2XVVeApIC; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com (mail-io1-f51.google.com [209.85.166.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D5D3A117C; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 07:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id j2so9923011ioj.7; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 07:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k2ALYF/INGNFzVB+IFT1/pZkXy/CnQEqbX4Ly71TpDE=; b=tFBiOAtTkpAKobbOVofUVnehSSqPvT3mCVtQWCiJx1jKpDslRo8+tGMj/50DF76ADV UYKwfj4P1LZhlPKopeune9nAZmCzf5UYa2+PVqDhkrpCol0o9qN7DO0JvmtE7LC2B21A +cUJKyUCEn1Wl5vvtKRhYrDF+IsApi5b0NLU4tA/Av6D73S5w9PY/u9Xq0Z3KPylonzZ wKpD1p9uhD/cSCJfJteBrQzV5Zwg4CSUmI+6e7UD7yT5M6kRDtApwXars2VZ0yZPc8hW Elt4jrEcCzQlzTeV+zdETkk2pblwpdnKhaArb6AIS4Q3TOif4ceawF6CydqKJsIAz0/F FmNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f0WU4RZAcdiyn9lJ1sK4dRdVAale/y+SYajae5buXgQb9PvbT YBsW4sEMuxvjwtyu0t4A/Rs/N1FGacn7o9QuqYk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNYUiaExn1Skr6GepUQhLmB9Vh3lbsPeYD5eNd34VRCAG7AsgqEk7NU8/k3Af2kxlZj++7LOFtY38XJynNs3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c045:: with SMTP id u5mr12972095jam.125.1599316752993; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159925400198.5399.1992122496217646432@ietfa.amsl.com> <0a018fbc-aa4d-8a82-c0c6-95ee02daa58e@iit.cnr.it>
In-Reply-To: <0a018fbc-aa4d-8a82-c0c6-95ee02daa58e@iit.cnr.it>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 10:39:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+E6=JKcwQKr2r=TXEJtARoCyrh+U8Hpc89cuOcuFp9OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response@ietf.org, regext-chairs <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, regext <regext@ietf.org>, Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/G9huCJrNavg0omjBx3rc9d19sQg>
Subject: Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 14:39:15 -0000
> > ** Editorial: > > -- Section 1. Editorial. s/fewer data/less data/ > > [ML] I was suggested by a mother tongue to replace "less data" with > "fewer data" before WGLC . After a further check on the web, it seems > that "less" fits better for massive data. Indeed. The rule is that we use "fewer" with countable items and "less" with things that aren't counted. "Fewer coins", but "less money", because we might have three coins, but we can't have three monies. "Data" isn't countable, so "less" is correct. Barry
- [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ie… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draf… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draf… Mario Loffredo