[regext] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 18 February 2021 14:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C223A1269; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:11:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <161365748095.3454.6610959330800171948@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:11:21 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/GBAwCPXfxyYu8zRRxuf_SATi8Fg>
Subject: [regext] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:11:22 -0000
Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 1: "Servers MUST return an HTTP 501 (Not Implemented) [RFC7231] response to inform clients of unsupported query types." I don't really like when already in the introduction one leaps into normative statements. Doesn't this statement more belong in either Query processing or extensibility?
- [regext] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draf… Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
- Re: [regext] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on … Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on … Magnus Westerlund