IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: (with COMMENT)

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Wed, 17 February 2021 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0603A1A40; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NeR9RghZ3Aay; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail4.verisign.com (mail4.verisign.com [69.58.187.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FAF3A1A3F; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=3116; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1613569820; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7OhjQSUewBwKS3NOOcaam3v2Hs2qtY63Sq4/CWh9Qbk=; b=iRaXZJndK0buc8BuUvV6fDepJy5K1g1y8w0n4ROgJafv/x1TS64q1ARH SorxL+PkHnbz6KXl/uGtx9fLnKXZD02cvWL9ScWI5qVZj8MmWKnc39C4L 0dV/XE4rlYNPRdXNooDufcLrfyG+y728pVM0w+avd1LxLCj/TWR+bl3em +bT6syTISbx8dnRFVjYk0Ulb/KfF/nkb70TTm7FVGVn+ho4QKaopMf+Rq njHxO4jNnigi2553mkEl4UbHMHql8eGe63/XC2IuIPQoyKoJdzllaM/Em 15Y/nz/MJTnq8ThIvWqakq3Fjo8dENLPlbJtbctCr5ajOjYg5rDu6xgpV g==;
IronPort-SDR: cET9Bdkju4JULjgX3ADr0fpGFtrtrZGcFCsOMvVOv/NmJoqhZNOS5s0QNxRlMGOQnJqWk04gLW alvEYVysc6uTUlFDMPLBZTq1PSkq9H90GxWJk7+OE3ThvIqjp6ZZNQt79bwXzNmBLFWoyq5P3H pCwwhpddyT18jxZUhDzuGSYyd9fHMP/6CmI+YLCHTSLz2TQ82TWYMEKl2eR8RhsQNpHjZY2Pej MwzX+0cuF3vEo0BodfdKYSJjvxB/qhASStV6rJZJf629TgU9BBAVwA7aXy/jeXiqv6G+2gfUhK jZo=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,184,1610427600"; d="scan'208";a="5215294"
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:50:18 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::a89b:32d6:b967:337d]) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::a89b:32d6:b967:337d%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.002; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:50:18 -0500
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "ek.ietf@gmail.com" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces@ietf.org>, "regext-chairs@ietf.org" <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, "Smith, David - Dulles" <dsmith@verisign.com>
Thread-Topic: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXBTPT0Hhu+w4b9USfxCh6V5hBng==
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:50:17 +0000
Message-ID: <5CA559DF-42D9-4963-A641-4733A181D97C@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.41.20091302
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <232A3356BFF27641A20E435C0DD4261E@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/JhmtyOeapToZmZ5n6kQ0hEqkWvE>
Subject: Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:50:22 -0000

Erik,

In considering your comment:

    * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol",
      Perhaps

The intent is to indicate that no new EPP protocol elements are defined.  How about changing it to "does not define new EPP protocol elements"?  This would be included in the posting of draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-08 along with addressing the other feedback.

Thanks,    

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 2/17/21, 1:03 AM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:


    Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: No Objection

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to https://secure-web.cisco.com/1EvzkPla5kphOxGVrCWpPS-vQ-Lm067uGD8F4DXzkVahpMJxVLLNs_-Okm_Ik_CTvBNgJoT-07wBTP_Fy6Gb9hOK_l6LDjmTe-zXsSs-o9sODDOeCHT8h_gEU4VOQnLzPyw7l7KgyQAI-uJRyPJnGYzNkWZMPIa6yI_x7q3beroMTMZJekZJz627YN1XJKgtC3A5VoC_gnuwma7Xsp25JJs0RsB1c1lTK2ORGpi6fv9hE7T40WHXiVOukDEqicdWA/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DObBfVwLMA9UQQeYSf2Ee-qWbljZcJZ0rWT1j6mlVZkOwB16KNnSyHTDa8k5iafiIBIbdUaUNsia_qWS9U5Yp0XK9igtqn7evXh9YRW__gCkdEu8opXvs_6gXrx1MTPgubXXQ53ZZUFr-JDX0zCWRkGjs1ox9lOzdMoNdgai0L9wo1MfAJmtZgsclohTVFrzJF_2CRzDjFmjp6309c2OfXgQTZBrsVpTyTlxFkU5MZjYsabZkSkBWfO6y5PY0fgm/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    [[ nits ]]

    [ section 4 ]

    * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol",
      perhaps

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email