Re: [regext] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline <[e-mail]>]

No particular text recommendations from me; this seems fine.  I was
just observing a phrase fragment that seemed to be either
ungrammatical or not easy to parse.  The intent of the text was, and
is, clear though.

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:50 AM Gould, James <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Erik,
>
> In considering your comment:
>
>     * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol",
>       Perhaps
>
> The intent is to indicate that no new EPP protocol elements are defined.  How about changing it to "does not define new EPP protocol elements"?  This would be included in the posting of draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-08 along with addressing the other feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> JG
>
>
>
> James Gould
> Fellow Engineer
> [e-mail] <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[e-mail]>
>
> 703-948-3271
> 12061 Bluemont Way
> Reston, VA 20190
>
> Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>
>
> On 2/17/21, 1:03 AM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
>     Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: No Objection
>
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>     Please refer to https://secure-web.cisco.com/1EvzkPla5kphOxGVrCWpPS-vQ-Lm067uGD8F4DXzkVahpMJxVLLNs_-Okm_Ik_CTvBNgJoT-07wBTP_Fy6Gb9hOK_l6LDjmTe-zXsSs-o9sODDOeCHT8h_gEU4VOQnLzPyw7l7KgyQAI-uJRyPJnGYzNkWZMPIa6yI_x7q3beroMTMZJekZJz627YN1XJKgtC3A5VoC_gnuwma7Xsp25JJs0RsB1c1lTK2ORGpi6fv9hE7T40WHXiVOukDEqicdWA/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DObBfVwLMA9UQQeYSf2Ee-qWbljZcJZ0rWT1j6mlVZkOwB16KNnSyHTDa8k5iafiIBIbdUaUNsia_qWS9U5Yp0XK9igtqn7evXh9YRW__gCkdEu8opXvs_6gXrx1MTPgubXXQ53ZZUFr-JDX0zCWRkGjs1ox9lOzdMoNdgai0L9wo1MfAJmtZgsclohTVFrzJF_2CRzDjFmjp6309c2OfXgQTZBrsVpTyTlxFkU5MZjYsabZkSkBWfO6y5PY0fgm/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F
>
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     [[ nits ]]
>
>     [ section 4 ]
>
>     * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol",
>       perhaps
>
>
>
>