IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72313A0EC4; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSFpu2xuaeOa; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569E43A0EC1; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id a11so2123689vsm.7; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WInRgO4Wv3qei2i83uW+mAjmXcVuR2NzJlVS43mT7v8=; b=jM9vg+h+LnxI8+sJaYgby2RA/Jf6oCPHWtLSeqRQoe0fa70KwZvCqPCg4z/ovAC9Yn VHQtCMRNYviTwsHDTC1olRQR2dqGlOXpLylVk9NhuCdFZEfElr/j4Z7ZvY1DDORo0pQh CIv8yuLyeVwZ4VOUGCAa4iP4LudXxuNCau2MYQNSlAyXF14UwTufeT7PznSr4Y7vZGFO erWvCojJXEDP964F0c6ewJt75u+xDkJHKvR0sHBXaHor//zi51M/i5G6GUCgzGs3VkgO 5pBYlSkxgBnT1YQPDigWeHs4Cy/dxaolIEcg/LhRoLGY5ro7BfP3RQA+0aVWn3l5+OW3 CGjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WInRgO4Wv3qei2i83uW+mAjmXcVuR2NzJlVS43mT7v8=; b=ewbyITFUXRCqEjjjIIDuL46cZ0QJqSbMEBeB5y8cRgj3afYWGksdy03O29uDrRiX6T PduCtg8SMMP6QGQduhr6TDh7mlQ43fThukNHUPU2vM+zpwQer98cqc3k5MOdm5HCyiEV 1aiqIvenGOxUBKIwfqhZ7wD9LB63LoJHGnIHvvb64Jh1C3KRMnidUZYHeejOFe4RmtbL YzozJUgLTRlQMt4/jrDopauyGMXX5qR6vDGGetCQqWltJFzd1VOlfkzmN38J61LwRets 8m/tK6nfKBD/L34U6KWvbi1BvBAzcJx//3tOK6N8LZ9cQXlhtlKdeWC3G26p4aX1lWa2 qukQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532w8ue5Q+k2/rC4PHnB/49kuDoPclBfP1JtsocMzCcLfWGUNVdG NhOQigFoKztLA15XEjKPjD2jzSlzea4LM1dvC38=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvk/aSjOk/JBV3sudcgmELdiSkt1vw7MM2OxIfpXSrpd6ecww7Mf7gswOGFSNPvkzGrIdKYmJDXd9Tay+41B8=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:8944:: with SMTP id l65mr97912vsd.54.1613711689335; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161363697070.28175.8388619274210761410@ietfa.amsl.com> <0b33620e6b764dc2b48c5b6aebd00a65@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b33620e6b764dc2b48c5b6aebd00a65@verisign.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:14:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbU_SdSU7Ywob=4uBDBBaWA=YJgv8TiDyX-3q1XR6+jjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis@ietf.org>, "regext-chairs@ietf.org" <regext-chairs@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, "mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it" <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003486405bba988dd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Y1FDJa84iRKDzK3nmeHqvuFlg38>
Subject: Re: [regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:14:52 -0000

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
wrote:

> [SAH] I'm going to blame that on one of the WEIRDS co-chairs ;) who
> reviewed 7482.
>

They really were a pair of slackers, weren't they?

I agree that it might help to add some more text to explain the rationale
> for the SHOULD. I don't recall why we used SHOULD here, other than noting
> that there may be some other response code that might be more appropriate
> based on a server's policy settings. A server that doesn't support search
> at all, for example, might instead return a 405 response code. Hmm, might
> this be an appropriate explanation right here?
>

That works for me!

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email