[regext] RDAP questions

Brian Mountford <mountford@google.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mountford@google.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C07112D6A6 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5ECm_xg5cgs for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x233.google.com (mail-ua0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D67512D5F2 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k90so156458027uak.0 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZJH66aSzKnty/EkRSQtA6m8CP7eNbPDtuRTHatwAWRs=; b=R1FZ7aGvZrPpdMc5jIiEA2sk71Thl6WurjYThQKcxSVbaeC6HATmo1Zg1tHNFUuFEw Rm6ZQ72rkaiaWjFuLX3lwVMNs5wwZA6xjzRycFHLWyudu6lQ575uDPSlgbMlx+UV95/5 QPXOS0lBplhrKaeddPYtEjHI84dc7UYeCupY65V3y3OSgEc+2LvG7qY2gLBTMZJtpSK0 dizDeoAr3NzQU/9GbHEqH9UlgoVp5epM8k24LahubLjZjXdqqZ3xjnoM8oM+n0SF4wRu P+CRsqFEkUXMqY3dUqteuYZJv+3B4V4hYWzthOoqReN4aLtLnneHtT6KHokX6iGQrsQz 762w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZJH66aSzKnty/EkRSQtA6m8CP7eNbPDtuRTHatwAWRs=; b=Xiuzvy+m6jWp+B1gc5B4jr+GJFzWsHJyPjGPofony+NFdzz5RIrMS14Fde+8sf7iif U67gTCa6VF+rAGgCOPOImj8A4exIrFC7LD6yYPn9DCsWwAyJ1wROO0v9AkrWlplpLfNt fsB3rfEKJXIbT+6Lo/M5ScEhr0A3/aMyieAtocm8VbVGS/VhNC5Vl9+ELsxV1L79bmo/ d6g5iKAlTO1hfhdcgrBT+5ObQe6aL8ZteE6MzqBWq5GirZaYM57ndFU4cqT4ByKnymMr Ctp6aNtxtcT1ovVY8EBBeqRsjyc/eweV3LhQBD2avkcQs7H4gBvLMyM79klFzOhIe4Mi Hndg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutypXgqUkRWvv/NV6unk2/5YOzxbg5oMNzGkd6WR+jVQH02Z1x39wIUSw/a58NQEnNAMDCwsVU0M5ZiQVPg
X-Received: by 10.159.41.193 with SMTP id s59mr34394695uas.41.1470241999159; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.197.71 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Mountford <mountford@google.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:32:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CALRmJyiz3yx=Gxa9LeWNUJU5CJczvc6ojjyVwUPL4mcbD5wKiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e33a21882d705392d6428"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/_IPEJv1DPPYpLoClXLS0lJuNVuw>
Subject: [regext] RDAP questions
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 16:33:26 -0000

I have a couple questions about RDAP RFC 7483.
RFC 7483 4.7. Port 43 WHOIS Server

For registries such as ourselves, is this supposed to be the registrar’s
server, or ours? I would have thought the registrar’s since WHOIS AWIP is
that way. But the registrar’s WHOIS is a URL, whereas this is explicitly
not so.
RFC 7483 5.1. The Entity Object Class

The RFC indicates that among the items of information we should return for
an entity is its role (admin, tech, billing, registrar, etc.). But contacts
don’t necessarily have a single role. The same contact could have more than
one role in more than one domain. In our database, the role tag is
associated with the mapping of the domain to the contact, not with the
contact itself. So it’s not clear how we can provide this information for
contacts found using a direct search. For contacts displayed as part of a
domain search, or for registrars, it’s not a problem.

Thanks.

Brian Mountford
Google Registry