IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] RDAP questions

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 04 April 2017 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78809129497 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ixHZvbT9zg1l for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59501293DF for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r203so174044910oib.3 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nsg9RQEj6tMOO3n5U3V15g+Qiqc2oyS9ZWQuq+LamCI=; b=fVnhvZG1md8BnFzG/17IwQFDyL/QayKMeJYOc8lPOx4LdaQiJxBgKxidi7n0x3JaC8 7nAQORrwjWR3LJUYcvuShDxws/5lQ6OEomaVL+wFnpKrId25UzZKqpquIXroNq7ieEvg wR/zqIs0BIBgTvpKTvsvpJsnlb+fLF4MNa5j+aXStpBZkDFy5yYGhp0NhMvdRhKmuyJG QUI8/kb8sv3Wyx/rwpK7Q2ZDk2eADB3rXaojwVlVdAqQRnMoLsFkSK6ebiLUSZEoT42k ZFMwVSVD5NGtSmVIcZLhHsagzO7U6nZsU8M+Lkc8RFRgXlahYaTkbMkbvU+JtoCz2NWp xsbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nsg9RQEj6tMOO3n5U3V15g+Qiqc2oyS9ZWQuq+LamCI=; b=Nz9V5eozkN8NHY9UelBXDujHR8xO0Cgsq7HO8WYgRfKQ3U5lGdju2muE5Wn+iKwicC L0puNENPonzmdNI98MGzRjFn5cjRLdPabXiTBCZWWLuOOg/BMeRAu9kOLW3gT1kOZhnL a7QI6dnTK74j8C+dTV4H/ZYjvjPkHKN23DoMCqIw5zgHtXsSUI574e2sKjXA4XEgITJo OgALmE0u0sulr4kYdY4fSkZB0LLES5yFwc3djFrqUscvvWegS9lBobfV8vbH3kIQ2KkC WA2quRyKnqrNLWMR6FNWWypo85DNO8fWqpqJWGfj3G9l7HfzfeQLqt9yLSAMDCuO+BNd ISdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3lxo8CmB5iQpQzZip/C/P/4zrELloxZpF0NECX1+3iZIRyvfT6mIYkuWKVIZMb78tnzJqQ/cCa7Y4Bcw==
X-Received: by 10.202.216.84 with SMTP id p81mr9234729oig.193.1491331702942; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.30.132 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [192.252.241.5]
In-Reply-To: <1A941775-2732-4E20-85D1-471E9ACAEA2F@gmail.com>
References: <CALRmJyiz3yx=Gxa9LeWNUJU5CJczvc6ojjyVwUPL4mcbD5wKiw@mail.gmail.com> <64CC805B-AD64-4127-8645-C576104AFA8B@arin.net> <D3CF5FFE.1174C5%gustavo.lozano@icann.org> <CALRmJyi2LuoJOFAN95dZQs1H4KEKzM6pEDz=rEBZ4QmqqfHVWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC1BbcRevbXPZY166tHLRB_eoSgir7u8W+usdmDZywFZprHbYA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC1BbcTx8owTCvRvJ26MDcMNgfEX76japV1MAnBvGNxBDMGbdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC1BbcR3Yv7E2Ka0+SHO1J15UeGHcF-hcDEYYwbF8G=TMSrCJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAQiQReKyHzJqJJOLoKbbL1eVTPaz=FLV1OmCH0fp-ZnEhwMng@mail.gmail.com> <12B41E2A-FE42-417B-BEC1-74C3B59317B8@gmail.com> <CAAQiQRdGWs+o-BvEcdffbMSdBD7iWTsiZEXpEFWi4sd+MT9TqA@mail.gmail.com> <1A941775-2732-4E20-85D1-471E9ACAEA2F@gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:48:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRf5vcBbCqNojo-KGRXZjHarZNh3jo1LEWeS3w-QCOA_Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/uphv-8KvKc23TirvorI7g7_SDeA>
Subject: Re: [regext] RDAP questions
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 18:48:25 -0000

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 20:44:34 CEST, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> wrote:
>>On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>><rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> PS: can you please answer the other question too?
>>
>>Can you restate your questions? I'm unsure what is being asked.
>
> Shouldn't there be a reference to the  IANA Jason value registry?

So if I understand the question correctly, you are asking if there
should be a reference to the IANA RDAP JSON Values registry in section
10.2.2 of RFC 7483. Since Section 10.2 establishes that registry and
10.2.2 is a subsection thereof, it is my opinion no reference is
needed.

But that's just my opinion.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email