IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02 Review Feedback

"Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com> Mon, 01 April 2024 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jgould@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DBFC14F5F4 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lo0wGA2YxpX2 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 09:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail6.verisign.com (mail6.verisign.com [69.58.187.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93EFCC14F5E6 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 09:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=18816; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1711989043; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:mime-version:subject; bh=qNK5uBapvghzy/xn8a98D0kFEP5pN6F9eVZWOfXJMwk=; b=d/yiqYUdSH96JTCjE1m4oU3mHTq5UA2RrMbboP69YdeuG+KcRmCdRLFA WjFAbDC7JksCy/btGYpun4lS+JPAtQaPx6Nrwghvs4u4aax/QFqDqcVoe 5SCHFLfXcnybNmCJxQztauPpI1H6kmx/1SmYL9qnmxjm18tpKHr+3oJ62 2baVkrZ9X7d6909G/3XXWroOUTR4LGq5D2g5tbyXih4NsWJLtes+dJtyJ ZPbkI8QiopjCm1jMq9clDKkD6QpjORxTwQ/AGZP6KTUXjxNhtKxY0GF3y cq0MUQZ98s5uUuO3Q6V0RhH2xFHU+8lbgTKtELtbnhp6KAlHkg6jx9Hxo Q==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AWGZ2jW5RWO5vK/U2OaigQ==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9jUPrtXmRoy4eGnqVAM9Kg==
X-ThreatScanner-Verdict: Negative
IronPort-Data: A9a23:iaD7g6oDL1zvW1KiGXk4jk6hp6xeBmL5ZBIvgKrLsJaIsI4StFGz/ 9Ym7Vv2Y6LbNTf1e9hoKNPhxf41ycCHyYMxTgY/qS88FitE+cGcD9jFJUysY33LccfORh455 JwVNIiRcc1oRSTW9h7wbuHr8ydyjvzVSOT2U+WcZS0ZqWOIKcsEoUsLd7kR3tcx37BVej+wh O4eg/EzGXf1hmV5aWlOt/mK8h9l7aqv4WhF5AZhbKtCtwaOzSlLU85GdfC6IkWjT9gPFIZWZ QphIJKRpTqFokh3WrtJtp6hLyXml5aLZVDmZkJ+AvXk2l4a4HVqjs7XDdJEAW9PkTKFgttt/ 9tEsJ20WG8BM7bF8Agne0Aw/xpWY+sep9crHVDl6ZbPlxGeKiO1qxlTJBpe0bMwq74f7V5mq KRwxAAlNnirm++wybSnfehg7uxLwB7DZd53VtlIlFk1PN5+KXzxa/yiCexwhV/csvtz8cP2P KL1XxI0NUidPEcfUrsgIMlWcO+A3hETehUG8A7F/fJfD2L7lGSd25C1WDbZl0DjqWy4US90q 0qfl1kVDC32O/S29hW3qHCT29Xwun7le8UvTpqx9/FT1Qj7Kmw7UHX6VHORm9/gtWiTa4oFb VIf/TA266E+slKxVd+7VBq9yJKGlkdEHYMPSKtjtVrLlvu8DwWxXwDoShZDZ9s7sMMeWzEw1 0SIkNWvDjtq2FGQYSnFrujF8WjjUcQTBT4AWBceUTsA2d7y/IwciAvxZ/MyM6Hg27UZHhm1m VhmthMWhbwIgc8TzI2y51HBxTShuvDhRwg59y3XTnjj8xgRTJSoaIG49XDa4OpOaoGDQTG8U GMskdKYtf8IAIHVzmmWXv9LGbCyovyCdjfGhwcpAYM68XKm/HvLkZ1s3QyS7XxBaq4sEQIFq meK0e+NzPe/5EeXUJI=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:ieAvMKkkIwpkiaaZ0uJwU/DiRmjpDfIb3DAbv31ZSRFFG/Fwz/ re/sjy1XfP5Ar5K0tQ/OxoWZPwOU80mqQU3WB8B92ftWrdyRCVxeNZnOjfKlTbckWUygc378 hdmt1FaeEYemIVsS+V2mSF+p0bsb26GeiT9IDjJz0Gd3ANV0hP1XYBNjqm
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:xoo6PGsmFa/1/zLdSGJArxxP6IsMTVLvlnXvfnWHLjt3a/qoE3iZ+axdxp8=
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:+6ulEARWSM4XLEVlRXS9hgxaLttY5p6pGRwAvpMfheChZA9/bmI=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,172,1708387200"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="30079439"
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.48) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.37; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:30:42 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) by BRN1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.48]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.037; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:30:42 -0400
From: "Gould, James" <jgould@verisign.com>
To: "jasdips@arin.net" <jasdips@arin.net>, "andy@hxr.us" <andy@hxr.us>
CC: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02 Review Feedback
Thread-Index: AQHahFHw/GkRRxOt3kOCVvp1dl549w==
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:30:41 +0000
Message-ID: <95A7EAAB-6311-4769-A0A2-0D2F8572CF67@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.82.24021116
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_95A7EAAB63114769A0A20D2F8572CF67verisigncom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/dOW-kEnZr6QEMiOF96S2aIzHRc8>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02 Review Feedback
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:30:48 -0000

Jasdip,

I don’t see an issue with removing the redaction section from draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed, since I believe the use of redaction is a policy decision for a server.

--

JG

[cid87442*image001.png@01D960C5.C631DA40]

James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgould@Verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgould@Verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>

From: Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>
Date: Monday, April 1, 2024 at 12:12 PM
To: "Andrew Newton (andy)" <andy@hxr.us>
Cc: James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02 Review Feedback


Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your feedback. One comment below.

Jasdip

From: Andrew Newton (andy) <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Monday, April 1, 2024 at 11:42 AM
To: Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>
Cc: Gould, James <jgould@verisign.com>, regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02 Review Feedback
> I recommend including a registration of the "Geofeed links" redacted "name" in the RDAP JSON Values registry with the "redacted name" type field.  If registered, the "description" member can be changed to a "type" member.
>
> [JS] Good idea. Will do.

Is this really necessary? Under what conditions will a network
operator be publishing this public CSV file that then requires an RIR
to redact the link to it?

[JS] I guess we were pre-emptively trying to tackle redaction for geofeed links :) but your point about such files already being public seems to make redaction unnecessary here.

Question for the WG: Are we ok with removing redaction from the RDAP Geofeed draft?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email