IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 26 January 2021 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E115C3A0C6C; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:23:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFnSY5yLZ9O9; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f171.google.com (mail-lj1-f171.google.com [209.85.208.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657743A0C6A; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f171.google.com with SMTP id i17so19533476ljn.1; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:22:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3f550ASVQPhO/S8UwZJtZ88BfmwUnDbGmRmIPRVX46Y=; b=pv3o6+znlRfipZ4TKJOtz4ElD6Ot1fOkqWmpf2Tv8sNecpIzWjmi4l2nA82jzewzEp Bw1aQzUXUAyA6KTGybDUptOhhcV6ijTf8yVZvH4NzjlJZDq9AMb99fh3/gazUjbvLBVE kY5PPuogi8+1kV8lquui/i+IEa8/VRLaZBC9I/wWGVKUUiZoBUmnpbKBUdI7/n49qz8m FUbHtUKknuAEu9PWxRvNLAa0UVKXnl7v7oeMretMC8YKMjFi7jm2+eOW1tRVjo4IC63s tYCUt/Rh67lRvYp30Ba8vhTDs6zPpX5hLbJMnzv05+Hr+Qe+p+gaB1z0u2Bh5Msm7Y5A ZvhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Tx389APOM3D6u8l7RIP5OUDhDxMGOruVnWA7617PQqPvqwrBR rrPs26AiT4tVRLgyR9R4Toexi/G7svscv/S9l24=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkxOeG/wQreDJUSlnG0xC2Z6rnSvtI6MKYqvyMSRexLYD/55YxbKYhqX/UVOg3AH13PU3ZiTrcOzM7qWi6jsQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5cd:: with SMTP id g13mr2857263ljn.248.1611667377433; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:22:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJK9U+_yfFxH_++M-oHsiRmfQSQAkvki-JgzRzAbDx0FBA@mail.gmail.com> <e56308a1a57c4b6fb391e7f9436165ac@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <e56308a1a57c4b6fb391e7f9436165ac@verisign.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:22:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ+W8AjiEKN9NkSUCqOXbDNBC3zJS2iiMeJ1KPEEG3wEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis.all@ietf.org>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087300d05b9cd8d1d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/kVsnEjve-YUE0QjvHSQxvcBF5vI>
Subject: Re: [regext] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:23:01 -0000

Of course, yes, 8174.  My fingers had a light bout of dylsexia, so it seesm.

b

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:42 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 4:25 PM
> > To: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis.all@ietf.org
> > Cc: regext <regext@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02
> >
> > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links
> > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> > is safe.
> >
> > Hi, all.  This is ready to go into last call, and I'll do that as soon
> as I'm done
> > reviewing 7483bis.  Only one comment (and it applies to both documents)
> is
> > that you should please use the new BCP 14 boilerplate and add a normative
> > reference to RFC 8147.
>
> Ack, and thanks. You do mean 8174, right?
>
> Scott
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email