[regext] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp-00 (Ends 2025-10-27)

[James Galvin <[e-mail]>]

This WG Last Call is now officially closed.

Although there has been quite some discussion on the list regarding this draft, not a single person indicated support for submitting this document for publication.  For completeness, there were no objections for submission.

The discussion has focused on what started as a suggested “editorial” change and quickly became a material change with differences of opinion regarding the impact of the change.

Absent support and with the continuing discussion, clearly this document is not ready for submission to the IESG for publication.

The document remains a WG document and the discussion that has started should continue, ideally with a different subject line so the thread can be followed more easily on the list.

The Chairs will issue another WG Last Call when there is a consensus view on how to resolve the issue.

Thanks,

Jorge, Antoin, and Jim


On 13 Oct 2025, at 16:33, James Galvin via Datatracker wrote:

> Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp-00 (Ends 2025-10-27)
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document.
>
> Abstract:
>    The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) includes features to add
>    functionality by extending the protocol.  It does not, however,
>    describe how those extensions are managed.  This document describes a
>    procedure for the registration and management of extensions to EPP,
>    and it specifies a format for an IANA registry to record those
>    extensions.
>
> File can be retrieved from:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp/
>
> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping
> [e-mail] in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to
> resolve them are highly appreciated.
>
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79
> [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
> any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be found at [3].
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]