IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Book references

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 18 February 2020 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BD1120802 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3TDtLbSaCPH for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF86F120145 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE689F406DA; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D20F406DA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tH7SdtrhjGZa for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8084F406C3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0109.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0109.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48MWPn4Z5jzyW9; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:39:09 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=m7NY=KFxsUsUZM3Nriw9QQfBUGCodF1Pd+5ctDTApwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:39:08 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 603747548.4569041-556979f87a5e87b2a5e3fca96634974f
Message-Id: <3AD2961A-2B13-4519-A21F-3135B62CB55D@tzi.org>
References: <CACsn0c=m7NY=KFxsUsUZM3Nriw9QQfBUGCodF1Pd+5ctDTApwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Book references
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Do DOI references work for you?

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2020-02-17, at 23:03, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear people who care about RFC formats:
> 
> XML2RFC v2 defines a very anemic reference format. Essential
> information for books and dissertations such as place of publication,
> number of pages, editions, institution or press, are all omitted.
> That's despite the fact that existing RFCs do include this, albeit
> inconsistently, in their references (RFC 5905 cites a book, including
> CRC press, etc)
> 
> It would be nice to have parity with BibTex: this information is
> essential to differentiate between printings and editions and in
> tracking down difficult to find volumes. This has recently come up in
> editing the roughtime draft, and likely other NTP WG drafts will have
> these issues. While the annotation field works, maintaining
> consistency when using it is tricky.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Watson
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email