IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] xi:include in published RFC XMLs

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 18 February 2020 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B00120814 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CGDSFaJYXIJt for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85526120813 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E39F40718; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6CBF40718 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jcykM-Lrm52 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76446F406F5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:48:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1582055295; bh=mxBM1ROAYN6D09a7mJDxZQToe/nm4IJ/NwMv7s8WP+I=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ir9YX53QqIUU0ifhMupseGh+IF7He1ypmmSHViGQPkR6DCql+fqMLTIsaSuntxSVP /4Tzo2OY23HpWpfVYQGI669Fpp4XudOa1KA1YEPoYOEuUmEIeMSwUQgjgTqibNcir1 x7JLinM2ZqRrjZ66LRmkVKmmso/EFcr+mI8cB3JM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.159.240]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MkYc0-1jjTfd1HIM-00m6FQ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:48:15 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <A96042E4-A9B3-47C8-B3E3-8AB5FBB444FE@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <63a4df1a-5c73-b87e-85f4-6f56fc4a763a@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:48:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A96042E4-A9B3-47C8-B3E3-8AB5FBB444FE@tzi.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9ntHwtwhLVqEohzCtxQh0uQG2/bMvhLVvnhpAOPDSR96ROqSCRA pUX1tMZFn47IZ2g02xvpmJ3OpMTblZuvK/vdgOBgbFW96he/8aMYrabCJX6YarX08pRQrOo i112mjrmt81r89lwNfzSMKdigFxXR4hUSNU9GUMDh5hhJFjmqyumIxjmgh4tXSpslDBo3I1 yEtMdmkOkypr6LgHxVLLQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:XjvP1GCoB/U=:KeatbZEnAaUujl4A+YeApk zsG+0y4TSCYIc/2q55jyRpXcWyI6j7EzyIEidnt/otLUMPko3+hFQdbOpTkd0ZD0pBbpXEffv 3TpSwKqZOyWooZDaJp1mFAWgH+OEv0lhL3rvg4m8SEAtt6MoOd0Ej4XFmCfP2Uz0+s/5q3D9a r4+TkOr2FddaJy8i5e/caW56eRNCCeI+Z6sVoynkgfKntfG+9RONOCZnKuf/DwPE8eKCefA0Q qLWz5qQ+WPuHrSvimfDoK2zd/1V+hE+W57qnJXotkmPt4bwzXDfjrsDUbLXNQnyXrllTx6QuI 1NN7N3WMdSYHzG8POXrdlu46rY7FnORpLmSdURF+mPJc+V06rAEoKhgBuDdrEyw5uQFhC3Utc 5gWwk2BNIlYrxbSa72SS6knL2oxbDlkuaL2B2p+ZB/8MIVaPX8DJ6a7EJg1B0OD3Ofh5t7fbf 66bmkKvGbnw2vswj/6X3o4jW4mfhU6BRfwBThfICK8cSXrwisV7grF9585XoWryzl8EkayA6C TL+ucyqf1W6aBXElGEUmZymSiLj5vGiN3aPQ/1cX0gaYNYYiqz0v24vo2SLzFEz9ltH+aCymM s6C0+6cPPlH6oI1ocuoacZQ7zbwlQG1HC2A5sjg25ru++yaDgorU5POf3m7+bt9xyG5ehrTTa AQm1Ht3b6MZRzTHtYToQtbbTqCdhD41A1SmrxKa0usef0BUwBMUdFb6BvENO49FwYOS8Qmg5f ZCy7cybEpoFFx4bLQBclz+0G2iDR4DphikDfrnLLJi5jKNBW2563l1yvVuFAKhC9U5wvPRGtv IY0Mu/hutCfWL8zorzFwUr0BwJn4aoawpc2cPDrEPq4jFe2eV/GV2y4eMgexVd0Kyo/1FJwFf H5S4OTf8PvtQR+ffx2vkTptDsGOnE8o6ZTdGWqK5WWXx8mwDTOsl0zDclM9zTfkiIw8ml3kxf CCPuvUDGKZNoSLZ0tzxHvw1I9SklWKDowlhfhRgMrMDImFEkGkw7jhYjtzkF5mu6yFfUdj8iY XzKU+evuv9ry0l51RXN7qkibYS3ywZT+DEehxIT5MH8jbrCU/fpHxz6sKWFWQnZXRuDUlc5nF WniKxRtwyi5mcrWLrrmmHXa0o8Kx2x5ht8HOPsCh6Pq51UY2KiJB7XmOoD5RLoqjzVM9kn4G+ 1iy4AOToU7P1IRLzMcUz3AHxLnPvrFapLLdIdlSfb6Q6OelulFwI5IOhg3kJvn0491lrrbZVK Vhp/+roy9RtQFPyQz
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] xi:include in published RFC XMLs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 18.02.2020 20:32, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Am I confused or are xi:include a no-no in published RFC XML files?
>
> I would have expected these to be expanded in
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8742.xml
>
> but then this is not the real final XML file.

Right. That's not the published one.

> As is, I can’t really AUTH48-check the references for correctness (the files at xml2rfc.ietf.org can change at any time).

Correct. I believe AUTH48 needs a check on the canonical-XML-to-be (at
the end).

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email