Re: [rfc-i] t with indent

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 29 December 2020 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354F03A0C21; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:47:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=opMMIWri; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=ayGqB9eK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBTnzbKpwVsf; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B003D3A0C1B; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C42F406D1; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12486F406D1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:46:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=opMMIWri; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ayGqB9eK
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72Wba2vnAUjC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F438F406C6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26891 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2020 22:47:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=6908.5febb1e8.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=j1svHaiw7cmP60TUmETiOaT/SpNn++s3ChZm89Z/wVg=; b=opMMIWriHaokIeuEKU39UnKqD/EvdbGlFrpuAxozhrGQkatxwgGTY5F9+OOg7/MaZo9vhpyYHTH+KHdDGY0MfO/GrU+pDyiPhEIUo8H77hPN5zANTqSst2xyMTn+VwzZwwAmf73cGsOPkZoF1A6TQBoCVurn6nFc7C6YDmU1Aq9kilkLNqyvNPXhODV04MYTK48MZrlBeiDaS+S6TQXq0bAls1ifAfEKf4sdNb1hWxgq+fOaCWptjjRKIKagPVAhHuXUuqC42vuP7wkuF7WWErbOtAlcQJrPqCMBQN8ueXNB+ONqieKJ35pVNbbQdoaVDJ2tbiPf4qL+xe4r3ELvcQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=6908.5febb1e8.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=j1svHaiw7cmP60TUmETiOaT/SpNn++s3ChZm89Z/wVg=; b=ayGqB9eKnmxTL/1oc+4OJqoYuvtIn5PYTUm+YqPtzpThC7dfgVnJnRo4RLS+ovvAoavzJzLQzje02h+u1/Po9ZaQRgm14bimuoNQ1d5uJJ7XSL5H/uizpcVCaORHmSHkY1TKqCvO6eGp2iKTVk3xolRDaakCm9VowbITcuvYLb0Tq/nxHYEnZGP2KrrP10viCiqadp7RO5QksxXIqMVhmxk+E+rhqHuPkLC8O6yo/IIjcOAD9eNiHq+55E7N7TOwGJLLji6mO+5Bw0x8SmuPLKBmUkS0lUIpMDNk5QwVimKcByyigiK/Dx0oRBEVYiRT2V9dS/QD1W+CceNuYwKZQQ==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 29 Dec 2020 22:47:03 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:47:03 -0500
Message-ID: <6c76db91-6f75-ebb1-902d-53c43014f344@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPLsY5BUj-msOZK-=uJigY=vb=UOCmw-jGFdzfS842sjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBOvxuD0pnWrkcywcKBMsd4CuCrLB4YkmDStpwh7e-SkSA@mail.gmail.com> <20201229204714.0FB903511F3C@ary.qy> <CABcZeBOQZBaiJ3vfSOL79bv60g1vR8+LCNNsYVg001EXPu+TSg@mail.gmail.com> <a7c58fc2-d342-12b6-8894-01599faef@taugh.com> <CABcZeBPLsY5BUj-msOZK-=uJigY=vb=UOCmw-jGFdzfS842sjw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] t with indent
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> Do we have a list of the cases where this has happened? If so, I'd be
> willing to sample and do a survey.

This comes pretty close:

$ egrep '<ul.*empty="true"' rfc8*.xml|egrep -v 'section-toc|section-boilerplate'

There's also about 1500 empty tag lists used to indent TOC lines to follow 
section nesting with pn="section-toc-something".  I suppose that's one 
that could be replaced with a more complex <toc> tag.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest