Re: [rfc-i] RSOC name

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hi SM,

On 19/08/2019 00:10, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Dear IAB,
> 
> I received an off-list response which addresses the question which I 
> sent to the RSOC.

Apologies, but that has too much embedded context for me (even
after I've checked the my local copies of iab and rfc-interest
lists for this subject). I did see you and Sarah go back and
forth, but I didn't quite manage to figure out the precise
question you'd like answered, sorry.

Could you elaborate on the question you'd like answered and the
various responses you've gotten so far? (And heh - feel free to
propose your fav. answer too, if we all agree with you that'd
maybe short-circuit a pile of discussion:-)

If doing that off-list is better, I'd be happy to try agree a
synopsis that we could send to the list. But on-list is likely
better.

Thanks,
S.


> 
> I find it uninteresting to get into a lengthy email exchange to get
> a simple answer.  I gather that the IAB should not be surprised by
> the limited responses when there is a request for feedback or when
> the responses are only from a select set of persons.
> 
> I did not bother to ask about the lack of coordination among the
> Streams as, in my opinion, questions relating to the RFC Editor model
> are unwelcome.
> 
> Regards, S. Moonesamy
> 
> _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing
> list [e-mail] 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest