Re: [rfc-i] Question about changes introduced by erratum

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 20 March 2020 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0D63A0D51 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jw1TReoHNFSF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A45A73A0D2E for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E165CF4071B; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F2FF4071B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1oijYPTuO8s for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C7F5F4071A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id h72so1566548pfe.4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EMh3DnDlaeVPCIBxddP04Fjr0OgPeRUOicwADyqKDA8=; b=nDeHIdzQh+RmSl7DNWo0Wa6zepY+v46TtiKGhxaelS8J3+NN76wdQzTrZCmU5tfNb1 VPGEDqzlPWTWNj0AYXEriDmZpQ6bRwchCyfvWaKuxo/00z3BXKZpItT3yqyMqmvQF/yD TeWtuwTCuI+gUum8CYnQ6kHua+Azq5976qnoEi48NI9aAvKYDXWJfeWFxZwoyWMLcTg7 ueQwDgDLBDhZGHua6GqRCblplM/nRgal+wTOpC9QPz1O2WRLRJLByM0wWRhhQjBxdG2G NlVOFnY5er2huSeJuItPUfYBKJ3dn3SpzUB1mXK0Cbcalk0OGoTi23w3Xm5Ed8A4u0EI 6HhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EMh3DnDlaeVPCIBxddP04Fjr0OgPeRUOicwADyqKDA8=; b=CigFOJ4U01AzowsX4drlGy11SfrS7oT4EhgaoydJ+gAurd3Oyq/zaMO+WUWfbaaTYw ZtCrR1K8cW4wBjJx31OGCxQpUVWUkWBW4YS2f0OdH+B6V9+zvQlpygVLZw7CM9/WQOXS tUcTVpwBLZPcg6/qNytixUYc8N89G+yBH4em4+NZNXFLFkj7xWQfrGqOFPN4qjkpIPm8 3dRdqo9g1kVatn5e0xnwgjoHknIAzEMEGfG+krBS9DztuZ5OWm35XVIZW/kDT8SFLdn/ 19Xc4TjFc19et4QEewii02bCyeBGVilmG9yoEjdJ2kRpP1HFsx9C0qVOssrRNS4NDS0N cNJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2IRLFGv18zkJzC7L7ioUs4e3sUb+eYh/GljAtrPfhaGGRoSZBI BF6OWZWgFBRzHHf5BKXHtXeKAL+K
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuvChWj2f8rRGXc97B9QUYw6eYeKAMMRWPL8nrj?= =?utf-8?q?Z4vK5qD1DcnzhNBaiZ8HELd7CoAf0dxtbQ=3D=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:7409:: with SMTP id p9mr7864080pgc.206.1584731824228; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm6254189pfa.149.2020.03.20.12.17.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
References: <358069c2-4654-83cb-f800-4e3e33952c7f@arcsin.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1791077f-7d4e-de24-8720-0b19f601b2ba@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:17:00 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <358069c2-4654-83cb-f800-4e3e33952c7f@arcsin.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Question about changes introduced by erratum
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Damian,

That erratum applies to an obsoleted RFC, so you should probably be looking at
RFC8601 instead.

But in answer to your question: dmarc@ietf.org, since RFC8601 is from the dmarc WG.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 21-Mar-20 04:57, Damian Lukowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question about a change in an RFC introduced by a specific
> erratum (5435). Is this the right list to ask such question?
> 
> Regards
>  Damian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest