Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 14 September 2019 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD521200B1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=SxivOhRD; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=vyk/L4Wv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbBghgcACzi0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5560A120026 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8619B821D7; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D925DB821D6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=SxivOhRD; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=vyk/L4Wv
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OblryEHtlIez for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72352B821D4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.188.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8EAP81b007585 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1568456720; x=1568543120; bh=ZYr2K6nTWZQFjYRGexEYyDSxignILs4/+dM14/1RYHg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=SxivOhRDvO7i6ksWn2jPPw1PqvrJgvUqZNUKtjShtUnJ7DQ0FhJ7/9EWwRkgV611F 7C5mM0/ilOSDgMhd2+F0wiRG4Rby0WlCjjW0p8QqVwYEzSUzGcvQLtOhjBAtg5GF38 o00agdSY4YtI9qXZbtNpRPCHaa+VwYWAmoS5QlQE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568456720; x=1568543120; i=@elandsys.com; bh=ZYr2K6nTWZQFjYRGexEYyDSxignILs4/+dM14/1RYHg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=vyk/L4WveJW1RvsJ4wmdf1KVdznZ1s639uVhUKgfQBF8AaJWLsY5Vk+DkQvlg4GT0 1lq5gVfPDV3QA2DL3iyMnRJMlMFUfgGnhtrJ3hejUqfHhI1zK00B9gZpvaQtBOAWtj 3NHY4WBbUqp3LUh34gowdG6GUa596Ka193DcFVF0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190914025849.0be3ad18@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 03:24:48 -0700
To: iab-chair@iab.org, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <156814308493.22374.12964350262219210658.idtracker@ietfa.am sl.com>
References: <156814308493.22374.12964350262219210658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: execd@iab.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Dear IAB Chair, At 12:18 PM 10-09-2019, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote: >As part of its oversight responsibility for the Independent Stream, the >IAB is soliciting comments from the community on the performance of the >Independent Submissions Editor, Adrian Farrel. The IAB is interested in >comments on the last two years of operation of the Independent Stream >and Adrian's activities as ISE. I'll disclose that I am currently serving on ISEB. As there is a conflict of interest, I will refrain from commenting on the performance of the Independent Submissions Editor. The IAB is requesting feedback. However, its information does not provide any information about the last two years of operation. Does the IAB have information about that? If that is the case, could it publish that information so that the reader can have a less than uninformed view of the operation? Regards, S. Moonesamy _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submiss… IAB Executive Administrative Manager
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Mike StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… S Moonesamy
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… S Moonesamy
- Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Sub… Ted Hardie