Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C4A12086A for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTZtUfdyikG1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98B9120025 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA64B80067; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D824B80067 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zTBxMaCucln for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F99AB80064 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id f12so57634106iog.12 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i8/wWMzD89Qx3H6YOtiMo4b0e30fibuICtuAlKH0j+s=; b=NqLzZhYxQ6LV0s/nsyINkmZ65Hyoi/413k8nO30EL3P++DBluxxQeGnq4DfPra8l3W hs6jOdkLI+VrzZy/YM1RcPY/63Demb9luueUfSWq3/laikAuzunde9EnZwZGpbGhRyxa O2rNwxMbqeKjEPL0WwCaUO7VrC4v2T7RCMyYcXprKvGAA06RzPGP8foOQ+hlUJuzrg0y TWXf8aS0gCpfDafIcrPfGF4YeC7h4jHHAS+bGPnIv5qDUE/ThNTjZ7HIGqX9Sp65Jj7i KwJPBr9wyxi7h9uj0CxintGOkN/Bqy9h8t9XpcRbnTct2Z8/XZY4YMbccTlLn45II6Bd 73VA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i8/wWMzD89Qx3H6YOtiMo4b0e30fibuICtuAlKH0j+s=; b=F9znx+k+bUuDL7iSJxid0vTeoCT+fGELLni9ep+UalC9mCdqOVc5mWZwENMUh+lWJ5 wPkPbmsyVO0sRcxWcdnrpZsRJjl4JAfxupDD4hMou+cVy74GYUIk3IMFEdzkbRRNd68e Wl7Pn7O5UocV7oHFsnyO0uYiwBtUisPqDXubK9GaydVegynmQThWN3kjMI33dgymnQbu gspOCT6e3vdJU1NGUxtAmN9LxbjEF4n13MDL1wlUcq3H26iWAJqyKkFwHdW/i9N1qhMM i2pjd4iC/3ndKjEOvCPovqISw4LRWcrSKhot2ZSJS3z/61NQPoyQhnbJuBNN9s17xzLS /GoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUAssMMIR1mUr0G8y0jW7FZxAq2f12EC+nYgJS7oJCqmhEkYvdr y9R/i839rbW4pF2zCTaEyANn7OcQNs6JlOcFlikQdf1u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQVwo66twhA8c+tKN8gR92r1Qc1mXlX/iYXRPpT6ElgLKNBG2QvO48XoaQjCf51JAUsVzhbanZbeYRVg3Vkus=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:ab90:: with SMTP id t16mr47627428jan.110.1568317703225; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156814308493.22374.12964350262219210658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e9a47208-c847-85a3-ba1b-2135da1e1b1b@nthpermutation.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9a47208-c847-85a3-ba1b-2135da1e1b1b@nthpermutation.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:47:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAeuokjeraHuL2KJt8REqhxnR2Gow90bZgeazV6GEN78A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Cindy Morgan <execd@iab.org>, IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6937263002461623006=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Mike,

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:07 PM Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
wrote:

> Hi -
>
> It seems like a singularly bad idea to be doing this review at this
> time, given all the uncertainty with the RSE and the upcoming RPC
> contract re-let.   I went looking for some mention of a term for the ISE
> in the various documents (RFC's 6635, 6548 and 4846) and didn't see
> anything that said more than the IAB appointed the ISE - e.g. nothing
> that would indicate this needs to be done *right now*.
>

If you review the announcement made in October of 2017, you'll see this:

"The Internet Architecture Board is pleased to announce the appointment of
Adrian Farrel as Independent Submission Editor (ISE).  This appointment is
for a two-year term, beginning on February 15th, 2018."

Since his term was going to end between IETF 106 and IETF 107, we are
asking for input on a re-appointment.  You'll see that the IAB of the time
did similar calls for comment during Nevil's term(s).


> Can I suggest we defer this to after the RSE process has made forward
> progress - perhaps until say after the March meeting?    Unless of
> course Adrian has asked to be replaced?
>
>
I'm happy to report that Adrian did not indicate a need to step down.
(That's why this is a call for comments, not a call for candidates).

I take it your feedback to the IAB is that making a change here is
ill-timed.  Thanks for that feedback.  If you have direct feedback on
Adrian's work, we will be happy to receive that as well, in the channels
previously named.

Thanks,

Ted



> Later, Mike
>
>
> On 9/10/2019 3:18 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> > As part of its oversight responsibility for the Independent Stream, the
> > IAB is soliciting comments from the community on the performance of the
> > Independent Submissions Editor, Adrian Farrel. The IAB is interested in
> > comments on the last two years of operation of the Independent Stream
> > and Adrian's activities as ISE.
> >
> > Please send comments to iab-chair@ab.org. In addition, please CC
> > execd@iab.org.
> >
> > The IAB would appreciate receiving comments by Tuesday, 2019-10-08.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Cindy Morgan
> > IAB Executive Administrative Manager
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest