[rfc-i] More about RFC10k
tony at att.com (HANSEN, TONY L) Tue, 05 April 2016 03:25 UTC
From: "tony at att.com"
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 03:25:30 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k
In-Reply-To: <57032722.7000201@gmail.com>
References: <57032722.7000201@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56566E61-A604-4618-A05B-9172DF83610F@att.com>
By current estimates, we should be there in 4-6 years. Hopefully at that time Steve can write a new RFC that "Updates RFC 1000". On 4/4/16, 10:46 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote: >I just came across this quote from Steve Crocker in RFC 1000: > >> Where will it end? The network has the exceeded all estimates of its >> growth. It has been transformed, extended, cloned, renamed and >> reimplemented. I doubt if there is a single computer still on the >> network that was on it in 1971. But the RFCs march on. Maybe I'll >> write a few words for RFC 10,000.
- [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] More about RFC10k HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Jean Mahoney
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k Jean Mahoney