IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 28 April 2022 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73511C15E6D2 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651185534; bh=tLy/TcFzVWxYfv778N6j7+dsOjirWhewonUUkdKaRMw=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=HCGRJDKHTvinlvW/+CLV+YJDqv+UTyYYdUQ5TNOiN2g9m+7VcZ1vxbyu5nk1LFlZE 3l8HWuYe/v1Uz+7huXhk0e8u9GWV9jd/OhZ5sLLjTZnK/of210A9PEH8k8GxvO46n1 j1dl2vJ6yTGw2m6IXRt/t0ih2xZDBeT91cePu++8=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Apr 28 15:38:54 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E81C1594B6; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651185534; bh=tLy/TcFzVWxYfv778N6j7+dsOjirWhewonUUkdKaRMw=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=HCGRJDKHTvinlvW/+CLV+YJDqv+UTyYYdUQ5TNOiN2g9m+7VcZ1vxbyu5nk1LFlZE 3l8HWuYe/v1Uz+7huXhk0e8u9GWV9jd/OhZ5sLLjTZnK/of210A9PEH8k8GxvO46n1 j1dl2vJ6yTGw2m6IXRt/t0ih2xZDBeT91cePu++8=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CF3C1594B6 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hYZqUgs4kp1y for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BDEDC1594AF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Kq9Wl5WMmzDCcW; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <56566E61-A604-4618-A05B-9172DF83610F@att.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:38:43 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 672878323.267921-2833839634de5ac64d813c6af3bf87ae
Message-Id: <DB53E3B0-5E93-4D46-9800-F20059569F54@tzi.org>
References: <57032722.7000201@gmail.com> <56566E61-A604-4618-A05B-9172DF83610F@att.com>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/rkr-TRclsarRfS5NU_UOlozEbCw>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] More about RFC10k
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Does anyone have a recent projection for when RFC10K is going to hit?

(I could do that myself, of course, but if people have done that more seriously I’d like to know.)

Grüße, Carsten



> On 2016-04-05, at 05:25, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com> wrote:
> 
> By current estimates, we should be there in 4-6 years. Hopefully at that time Steve can write a new RFC that "Updates RFC 1000".
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/4/16, 10:46 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org on behalf of brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I just came across this quote from Steve Crocker in RFC 1000:
>> 
>>>   Where will it end?  The network has the exceeded all estimates of its
>>>   growth.  It has been transformed, extended, cloned, renamed and
>>>   reimplemented.  I doubt if there is a single computer still on the
>>>   network that was on it in 1971.  But the RFCs march on.  Maybe I'll
>>>   write a few words for RFC 10,000.
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email