Re: [rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 12 February 2021 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1334C3A180C; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06B4bnC6cgvn; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0C93A181A; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2B6F40763; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB35F40763 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-yfGkg1T404 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF25F4070C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C19F223DD0; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <ybltuqijmul.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <48ED9B40-F6CE-4E2B-B369-D6F4D04C128D@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:42:51 -0800
In-Reply-To: <48ED9B40-F6CE-4E2B-B369-D6F4D04C128D@fugue.com> (Ted Lemon's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:50:33 -0500")
Message-ID: <yblpn15i3ms.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> writes:

> RFC7230 and friends, and RFC7540/1. Very readable and
> understandable. ISTR the FTP spec and the SMTP spec were very good as
> well, but haven’t looked at them in a long time.

Thanks.  I have always thought the IMAP spec was very readable too, for
that matter.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest