Re: [rfc-i] First v3 RFC is published - RFC 8651 on Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Control-Plane-Based Pause Extension

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 07 October 2019 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8901200B6 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOHIRq2GvQLk for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A09120020 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF861B80BB3; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA137B80BB3; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6z2mhVQxlUun; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55648B80BB0; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1570482366; bh=3sY8NqZvB2aDgw60wNW0VfNRSbOjApWQi2gUnXNgDn0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=jFuCwfaqtBIcCC4n33ENMJJtCdUEmFntINQajJquIhBTmOsyiF5e12MHIiKqH8RvV NPpJIquK28l/2k57N5TR5vFyXYw7BOeLdAaKjL1Qq4bsGWsuaQzukXkLqBGeFexk7N zOdzBxS2tnVYckmclowTidAKV44xFR1KIerPjOA8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.146.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQ5vc-1iUrtO1qlc-00M4Ck; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:06:06 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20191007195852.11BD7B800CB@rfc-editor.org> <EF2AB36B-F839-422F-AB3A-8D22F1A7FFDD@rfc-editor.org> <6e50fea1-eaff-c777-e148-353ab1c47afd@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <bb77dae4-3402-21c1-4074-4210304fadf7@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:06:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6e50fea1-eaff-c777-e148-353ab1c47afd@gmx.de>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rGYjwivyT6TJcCBeUIYXwaIKhWFL3FVvPiwmMkOq7vql031Mgnl PZM0bQJe8zzbuYjr0owCYDQTPYpXLjjV0J9mZSlQ3eI8zCKcEnJei9f7NJZZjJyf0lXLzTs CjKQZnotpq3AO+w4uakOdxfnR1k64Hxq3hQAJgMtBcMnme4EWWvl+2dRONOQ4YMsykfhQpx I2Mk6WnuC2ZyEihweuj1w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:KFA5Fu7dZgE=:qfPLbajLY1giafFWXqtPNQ kXrLTmq1w2O3E2nY0cwb7+DxeIgqSWOCwqLmj0+rqN0InAq55gFNKR9saQqE+HvrReditXzcU bb5h6BkRXUc4BtJzBL9SBJU7CIa4YLuW6n5FGw89JkJ0q9BJGldKlJWRUgkrQiNEcslS8LMqf gPt6mwLthhEKLZ8GjI74UOKdlHa3AEb1dItshKq1eegyEaC0ZE5QBRRelRU1dvWq/gEGM5D4w IDdML/fbYoaqVnttEhEzAvPUBuG622xtHvmkzIXyvvfG2j9EL++P+iumtUhry/6FuhdVLginr 8SZPbo1VBeX5Tg6MQx8DLE9xMDk1i1D90M2/JHeMB5dWXLxMEZJaBFNCPNI3zM3dtEFzIjLdD 9/WacC+0knilG0+WY+0EludOKf/64M9GcE6ZxtZTSZOwK4DIv11Bb5YGvAbY0iG7kPG4octsS Q+jtapDWSNPuWMd0hwe50EAXgT4Ow95iacyfrwNRtcCLew8sJgvzZZTM8eTgWR0Xl4Y4p/DEq J7DPg9tIHGGz28NGg35VnMuIUANLym7uEiiPVc8ISvrFehTqF62yPNY+M3lQu2tiXVYfPwRdk 2mvJYPW1RsukfPpETKvWgl3qL5V6tYTKnjhfz5wm2dT0wyiC0bALptDQDZ/QXLlv+b/TJYm5s kR+o7T8Vedz3XQDysswDx3USB7nXVe/Dl4sQ9r5BmHrEFBp8BsBIXS4iv/1OS1uf9snSsLn90 1RzzS6gnw2sZt9zE0xswWTEqHxdXNn3Xa7MfKDzP1exJhXbAgHMWbHybIOdM92BEtzycudaQn U2q1AB52ZjD276PvoN1hV0pLRBQtlzzEkF1kwmBKT7CEguDPGugIS6IFrU7Dz1HqMvTd0zXUm 0QTHnwPOaSKq19O6Sd1+KkuqnK46qRioM4i5pqg9epggt73QZ+fDoztEQAuOPkKFpQqOt98m0 eIBiKPlqRwI3/4AYipFZZmGioyBsn8Cv8b9Pv6FVz14nbthduUk0gXzN00w1H15LDLz0PhuKT 9L/fcrwoF9PVFK5dKjrxm4GycQo8wpeUBBmBhvDfyBZxviXVk++UYh/m08DNM9qLjTZZzeUhS lk1iy1QyRH7N1gLaRcuMA/Gl5x5IGwu9QsuQph82CIjAKI1pdH3Eifn+NJipOmwGUXz62wBRz qqjxtagAx8juiQWSrZUap3s7yanhhOOsrjcoHHvpNCK+KUNXxxDBbCGhBnd3GExdTIPpZvIkX 87DfEDOc5MfTZYIaC9G5txrkhsFOo0VcEmKw0n+cr2o23G2ecF00uZxKc16I=
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] First v3 RFC is published - RFC 8651 on Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Control-Plane-Based Pause Extension
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 07.10.2019 22:58, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 07.10.2019 22:00, Heather Flanagan wrote:
>> Wow, everyone. We did it!
>>
>> Thank you all for years and years of effort in getting us to this
>> point. RFC 8651 is now the first RFC to be published in the v3 format.
>>
>> As those of you on the xml2rfc list know, there are still heated
>> discussions underway about some aspects of the XML vocabulary. Getting
>> the -bis documents out to capture the reality of the v3 format is
>> critically important. That is in the top 3 priorities for me as I wrap
>> up my time as RSE (the other two are operational transition items and
>> the RFC Model process discussion).
>>
>> I particularly want to thank the RPC staff. They have worked
>> incredibly hard to fill the roles of expert copyeditors, quality
>> assurance engineers, and key stakeholders throughout the seven years
>> (and counting) of the RFC format project. This is an amazing team.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Heather Flanagan, RSE
>> ...
>
> So, as far as I can tell, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8651.xml> -
> which is supposed to be the canonical format - does not conform to the
> V3 grammar (neither the one from RFC 7991, nor what's in the unpublished
> RFC 7991bis):
>
> ...

Also, running the XML through an alternative processor (rfc2629.xslt)
yields:

> ERROR: user-supplied boilerplate differs from auto-generated boilerplate (inserting auto-generated) (at line 6)

...which is no surprise as the generated TOC is contained in the
<boilerplate> element, where it has no reason to be.

I understand that the V3 format is work-in-progress, but whatever the
state is, there should be at least one version of the format's grammar
that the published XML conforms to.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest