[rfc-i] draft-flanagan-rfc-framework-02 composition tools

stbryant at cisco.com (Stewart Bryant) Mon, 03 November 2014 23:27 UTC

From: "stbryant at cisco.com"
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:27:45 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-flanagan-rfc-framework-02 composition tools
In-Reply-To: <5457C254.4040904@rfc-editor.org>
References: <12093BCD-14FA-475D-810F-065EEBE87872@cisco.com> <20141101231012.66362.qmail@ary.lan> <CAK3OfOi6=_8vD=4aRRPGR8y7wm5PoskGh2QX3qP+-_1dyXWUWg@mail.gmail.com> <54578A22.6000707@cisco.com> <m038a0e2pr.fsf@tzi.org> <5457A423.8040301@cisco.com> <CAK3OfOifZT9c2N2kTmm7xU7d3Kn19FuN8OQDRXoLWogvdhnpBA@mail.gmail.com> <5457B7F6.5090500@cisco.com> <CAK3OfOgqM=H-1BiQcbZCk_+Vhcm9SkKbMAKdXdmm4LbVV9cmoA@mail.gmail.com> <5457C254.4040904@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <54580F71.4080208@cisco.com>

On 03/11/2014 17:58, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/3/14 9:24 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Stewart Bryant
>> <stbryant at cisco.com> wrote:
>>> Just because you have had toothache for years doesn't mean you
>>> should not go to the dentist!
>> That's not a very strong argument for abandoning the xml2rfc work.
>>
> If I were to hazard a guess based on Stewart's previous posts, this
> isn't about xml2rfc, it's about authoring docs.  If there was
> something easy to install and use that required no domain-specific
> knowledge (e.g., knowledge of the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary) that had
> "save as xml2rfc v2/3" as an option, that would be fine and dandy.
>
> I am hearing the point loud and clear.  I will be discussing this with
> the IESG in Honolulu.
>
> - -Heather
>
Heather, that is exactly my point.

Thanks

Stewart