IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Call for Comment: <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-02> (The RFC Series and RFC Editor)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 02:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9030D120806 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnegMV0Icf19 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1DA1200C4 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B1EB80F8F; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E45FB80F8F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3iEB6vLyiou for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38994B80F83 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id p3so10678034pgb.9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2HAwgEbYHRDBnsTEdoGI/mqAHpaXFGBCKbggwLXy9xw=; b=l88SvyTsZD4khY+N248UrPy5b30xQeFAyxM0/ss1k9S/Tf2E/wb+Gzy+hLLxRyFjPV 2wQmVXytK+S02m+XsjMYDYaPLuncnDlC4q5L4TNyAEEW6w3nhuaCowwDsonhbY5ewSgX Ey1w82XwmPZrqJpgXbKvS6/ZJs+52hrXWRQxLWraiPA8wYoowaqF9AAUlS1+pCB9UVa0 tlHYlavvmAGRnvkJlVIYoR/lYyZxplD76GtCmtBEuzg6dYZ3Ts0czWAlx26v/HF6yNyX /qT4+nenWbMqZffTiOY8JH4gy6c0O5Xsc3eX+/7jpCrDuuMMWfxIp6WjAvzQBnPBRUzM xKLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2HAwgEbYHRDBnsTEdoGI/mqAHpaXFGBCKbggwLXy9xw=; b=lMjrEhlv3gLF7y9zquWQhBmP88AeNEyF+d7dGQ/GO0JFBYv/uECa4jRneQ+jvp4xJV FVDYWO6cmVFeCenUMNXemkufEvWQlaNTDa7qsI7c5YV9TbAW1m+RJFl+tpaeyVkdCSv/ aSn/X25ne+w+3tyXTyTnBSGeEknOglf7o2T5+QtZJbxl8wduP2e6y0DsuZCazFH1zOEk di/w00XSnuC2YYLBMguND5GMSVIDQfJ9pl9sMWknXAGS8Vt/I269ABivqbieeYsMuQHu FF41BipQqi9vrTI4KCmJgYVbJ8tLhUf/0iPX1h06HwHdxTUtv/RnqFHi9dlPGLRFXr59 WQcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxkkBLxOHLheqynF7okXdMurjVp9pRbZv1AH9yv/D3/hQLkzuM pQP76TxRNg7VypnaAG1v/WfD6yHG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6Z3mVnWXxjkRRgvynjFezE5APDbUaG4T7vis02d1OkJh78t6T+aX8PP944PjcDS8MyRsG9Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2b4d:: with SMTP id r74mr8410775pfr.30.1568167592958; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p68sm34638300pfp.9.2019.09.10.19.06.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org
References: <156763101565.22770.5246009160641276406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f67a89c9-20be-cd2d-0d5b-2b288268baaa@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:06:28 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156763101565.22770.5246009160641276406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Call for Comment: <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-02> (The RFC Series and RFC Editor)
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi,

I believe this draft does represent the consensus of the IASA2 WG and cleans up some loose ends from the IAOC to IETF LLC transition. However, I believe that it should not be published as an RFC. The discussions that will soon start about the future of the RFC Editor model make that rather pointless.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter
On 05-Sep-19 09:03, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on 
> draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis-02.
> 
> The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC 
> within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4844-bis/>
> 
> The Call for Comment will last until 2019-10-02. Please send comments to
> architecture-discuss@ietf.org and iab@iab.org.
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    This document describes the framework for an RFC Series and an RFC
>    Editor function that incorporate the principles of organized
>    community involvement and accountability that has become necessary as
>    the Internet technical community has grown, thereby enabling the RFC
>    Series to continue to fulfill its mandate.
> 
>    Cover Note:
> 
>    {{ RFC Editor: Please remove this cover note prior to publication. }}
> 
>    The IASA2 WG asks the IAB to publish this replacement for RFC 4844.
>    The document is changed for alignment with the new structure for the
>    IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA), eliminating all
>    references to the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> 
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email