IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7788E120844 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=T8PIpxY4; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=JHtSZfgw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qeb1uhfIJr3t for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1079D1200B2 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE06B80191; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28553B80191 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=T8PIpxY4; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=JHtSZfgw
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oHd59oYf94w8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D39B80170 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.178.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8B8pDno025835 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1568191886; x=1568278286; bh=nW7Q1ec4Lo87s/ElCaAQ4OKpBR1RQrsPwWqi1MNrb4s=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=T8PIpxY4o3Fn2O9HpZrKpG/39Uo0OCFUzOcLzfIPOZueYR6A4wYwcocj/V9frGb+U X8qxOacHDddiAHFOHaBFggHIPohKEZc0LClQszyC9YLIU3L7TvzIwdJWeorldK/2kN 7B5ipnK1Ttsqx7EVp+hLH1CH11mb7E7evAYjXmB8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568191886; x=1568278286; i=@elandsys.com; bh=nW7Q1ec4Lo87s/ElCaAQ4OKpBR1RQrsPwWqi1MNrb4s=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=JHtSZfgw0ZiLw437vjPVV+vHc34oZPMjpcijbnHiEPzXYLxPPK96mCfBykjzRDHLH tfwGWneWpOeK/BTe8Ykg0takmIm98G3fWVTWVgjPO0DaX+mX+bfhsYp9hwAAeCuLPC QIQ4VhIQt4jmwQkDlvm4o85WiVBHonuw05mFNehs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190911013116.0b9b6e20@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:50:56 -0700
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgTqDTXgG1bU1DGBkdQ7XwV=2ryJzQU1QD8yNba-7ngk3A@mail.gmail.com> <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Brian,
At 01:38 PM 10-09-2019, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Do we really need to worry about that? This is a time of change and 
>I don't think it matters if we deviate from the letter of a 
>7-year-old Informational document.

The document is an IAB RFC.  It discusses about a version of the RFC 
Editor Model, as viewed in 2012.  What is the purpose of the IAB 
members (listed in Section 7) approving what was written on that 
topic if nobody worries about what is written in the document?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email