IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF541120074 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFnvToaKqu5D for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DE0120013 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341EAB81642; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5F5B81642 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGfyD_L0_6Gf for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966D6B8163F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id h195so12435412pfe.5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/hCPSv4vrpuHh3upLRbi4e2v43k9VquD4Xf+GNRSVvU=; b=dWLJA6abjr85pzSnu7yDdVTMCCMC3dtTWNDNmJaCR3W16aM9TSTw2UIon5ec/3qWk6 OMOsjwFPAi913/fzaR19tO6AZFeKHYhXW2Zixs4Cp15TDAnTWY/KjR0GdfILVfvKSmkB QbqvWkUlv4IiCH3ds4g7uG3KIfr59wPOmRL97K95Eu9lS4fCLEBmyl6N0EvNmUyRPmzr YmS/32tatmG6GS4WBs3i++YuGVSi7Z2Yq96TPWOx8aDLhCj78r92udu7fBfWYzpgCtOF bPUqccWw/jRbEl3XGG32Kf27SoVCtjj//7R+UT9MFy6RioqUm3MWzdX6KaQ6PaPfPJKf D4pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/hCPSv4vrpuHh3upLRbi4e2v43k9VquD4Xf+GNRSVvU=; b=ZJVM8dw05j9NjOjb2+OrV3skg4jZvRXgqmuIEAO8r1h7lcH18o8DRwHxHQTqhxyd+1 txKyyjlt+R7lGRtw4lNPmvzMJtPkf5c6/cxk9bIgVmfGFkX1ksipwjdoZHlXQFE+Kykh iANQ185vBOm/lECu7kS4G6DzbJ7J+sqtlY3mwmUlHJtNgILrwOLPG1M75eoW39+CCzP4 7c1+WXSBlp2sfLv/nH/0lH6R9l/U8otT7BVQYvXrr5ikIXVo4h5JU1tE3Z2xoU0nml5i YXlvGAAAl7elPgesRs/aDbnp3LQSp3FMI16toeb/C1WuUkfaMku47qfLcsxuWZhSK+7J J/pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWIwnoHoMYKDGyPP9PIJFA4Un8qYaWZ3mdwHDLrR2TNGj4u9jp5 5fkKQhjSTS9zI7ku3A8tgIQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjFl84/Ignhxo+MT7agbfB8mIJ56C7NT25TSZ4BaJObJSpba7RDDfU5px/w3kj+X5BHwrCeA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a4d:: with SMTP id k13mr29528848pgm.174.1568156805382; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm14888274pga.52.2019.09.10.16.06.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgTqDTXgG1bU1DGBkdQ7XwV=2ryJzQU1QD8yNba-7ngk3A@mail.gmail.com> <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com> <CABcZeBNw8c17F0bvcSJoS4R=dk_KoSx1jWkEnupUUps6k8UcGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgS88fD7BkrE4T0A+S99xN-b4JZDm4yu2nLAb3oiG50S4g@mail.gmail.com> <368275E4-F9F9-4B35-A764-0709C875A7D1@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <31b877c4-df37-ddfa-3327-2631e6741afb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:06:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <368275E4-F9F9-4B35-A764-0709C875A7D1@akamai.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 11-Sep-19 10:08, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>Even if one disagrees with the content of RFC 6635 (which we probably all do, in different ways), there are other, non-Informational documents that specify how to replace it with something that has community consensus.  And this ain’t it. 
> 
>  
> 
> Agree.  We have a process/mechanism. One of the worst things we could do is ignore it because “this time it’s different”

If it isn't already clear, I strongly disagree. When our self-imposed rules have proved to be problematic, ignoring them is exactly the right thing to do, unless it's illegal.

   Brian



_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email