IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E24120180 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCFLG1Wtu8Vm for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E3D120823 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC562B8134C; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B45B8134C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AfKEoYNLg0JK for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6EDB8134B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id q21so10542950pfn.11 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnpfz6a1fgz3/KeY/sPMcfTLc6mWVts0gUYTa96MdQQ=; b=JagOeCE5iDhyeLoHUwfOoWUhERMbJGCTfMBPgNYwkVi0o/a8r5CLZROey3KG2lQSPC EQ7dz6G+o0LsBuzsl/laFYs7cTNtP4nCs8FfbLFx1OXfxGkPofy5vczjvnvJYXIbHJPn utLoKFUKP9BkK0/th75MW7cum/r7C9Q/vTCZCFBMGQQAJMkkBUfFyG1Rokz7YafziAMj ZGR3mzuXcjtS0MDYUS0qFQazQ4SNshjzvgiw42N511BvxF+JtMVTDcSKds1/8SojkQHp 361IlfzCzg0baznIYUfMMsWwuUOHbN7R/QVaWEvq7Hn6HyFGgnq+eqRDmxJW7Fp1SdEb RFmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nnpfz6a1fgz3/KeY/sPMcfTLc6mWVts0gUYTa96MdQQ=; b=FU57Fdb7RYVl8PjiFgLWTWLmk/puoyA2Tb7JtXlHUB0Ufrr1/rfSrRaGDln4uAfHLf Q4YuQkHg/qfsVONmyGtA07Mf90OPdtEUgEiZ2Py0eRAyJ2esTp5Vnb0vmNz+PZ2ADmaL pGWf9lB5OA7ej4enoRxS6DPwcUcAqDO7ye1IyFH4LI2ZnECwWqdJ81g9zUlke2gp+ko6 202tSKS1K7mnKWqXybJktTRXEsikhc6UTF6IPiJG3wtTofwtEbQ2moZ6PbyoY02i9872 Cj727vkHZsDXK8SlG4EJkX8rr2Uiwl1kPFrbhQClC6WjQAvnNy4uh7XMhkHo+qPhMj9H nixA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxgyH56v6a196/Ca6IuZSVQh8KiFxnvWOMIL95K0nsUazSbiBY 7W3dzjOYvLdGxHbSyIupZj4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwi8eFwa5g4mdhf3SVeYAjH0jSEPKJZ9dGEhCtWBPiy7k2HrWqhwX9PQeaqzVIWxDN8kS1baw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c05:: with SMTP id b5mr424047pgl.415.1568081503555; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm4651330pgp.66.2019.09.09.19.11.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <f3edd70c403583ab560888be39001d14.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <09bb6e35-bafa-90d9-fe35-e2feb21e6564@nthpermutation.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <85f156b5-ad48-520d-a416-6c838b6d6174@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:11:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <09bb6e35-bafa-90d9-fe35-e2feb21e6564@nthpermutation.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

With that fix, Mike's draft looks pretty good to me.

Regards
   Brian

On 09-Sep-19 06:57, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 9/8/2019 2:25 PM, RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> With my ISE hat on...
>>
>>> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.
>> While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1
>> RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE.
>>
>> Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate
>> documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE.
>>
>> I don't think you need to include this in the SoW.
>>
>> Best,
>> Adrian
> 
> OOPS!   Noted and easy enough to remove.
> 
> Let's see where/if this goes first...
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email