IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

"RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 08 September 2019 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40572120289 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3f1TgdArLxIW for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59641200E0 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF3B80A71; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634F5B80A71 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly2QevXlycvq for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9FBCB80A6F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3143020217B; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-Ps8IYpVi3Q; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A34202179; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 87.112.72.158 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rfcpise) by www.amsl.com with HTTP; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:25:48 -0000
Message-ID: <f3edd70c403583ab560888be39001d14.squirrel@www.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 18:25:48 -0000
From: "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Mike,

With my ISE hat on...

> I also added an "optional deliverable" to cover April fool's RFCs.

While the ISE in some sense sits under the RSE, I believe that the 4/1
RFCs are the responsibility of the ISE, not the RSE.

Operationally, the ISE has always asked the for an opinion on candidate
documents, but the final decision has been with the ISE.

I don't think you need to include this in the SoW.

Best,
Adrian
-- 
Adrian Farrel (ISE),
rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email