IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B021120808 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwLUFncR5skD for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F3512080E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF5CB81614; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F364BB81614 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3zfJ9EAbJcR for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E6EB81610 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8AMvBT3030341; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:58:55 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=r4+Nzup12EZHTiDTRAVfwuPpNBVsiKbDaURKkSbTLLQ=; b=UnjJzKwTv88jVRuYtEOHZSwCq3LIwnbGPrrwaXn5dxQJdIiyJK5PfFA+kT9T0CNqI9o9 tD27jxIe9BrpgUarG74b6TI/ZQHmrIl0oigaxfW0YIIbSJAx5kPjtVwQDylfTmXDrxD/ RU8ixvvO+DDzTRiYF8qznkHJ4T5RR/YCHNPRW2YHe/RiKpCFKqqfSvDAgUzKpw7vq3Ld EllioBY4ofRwINK9JJ7rxRa2Ufwd8mo739VvCbO4g2f++8Ue0A1xyhybm+FxVDjb7WSR lMes3Da8rVD2QVDKC5QYPsrUmajtTA4BRKqimtJ1necI/mZCtc6mpsNZ1fVAhmLdVgsl 1Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2uv4y8g8we-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:58:55 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8AMlMW3009087; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:58:54 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2uv7vvyx0q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:58:54 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:58:52 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:58:52 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
Thread-Index: AQHVaBq1Rq6Pqqz9m0Kmvfrc6BMUzqcleDuAgABJGYD//8UWgA==
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:58:51 +0000
Message-ID: <8AA9B248-9815-4840-907A-A0CA3BEA9F72@akamai.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgTqDTXgG1bU1DGBkdQ7XwV=2ryJzQU1QD8yNba-7ngk3A@mail.gmail.com> <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com> <CABcZeBNw8c17F0bvcSJoS4R=dk_KoSx1jWkEnupUUps6k8UcGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgS88fD7BkrE4T0A+S99xN-b4JZDm4yu2nLAb3oiG50S4g@mail.gmail.com> <368275E4-F9F9-4B35-A764-0709C875A7D1@akamai.com> <e6400b75-ac96-6dd3-8652-db915305be25@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <e6400b75-ac96-6dd3-8652-db915305be25@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.125]
Content-ID: <750C1EF53D67CA428251F8A1BC2B092A@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-10_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=659 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909100212
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-10_12:2019-09-10,2019-09-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=636 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1909100214
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, IETF Discuss List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I think finding a caretaker to keep the publications flowing need not be inconsistent with the RFC's.
 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email