Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 18 October 2019 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823F7120129; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4sYXJ392sza; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7201200E7; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1571398941; bh=FdhH9bbWlbOlodY8pcDIdOQj0AXwAvIt/NOZEQtSX6o=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=jLOPVzv6BO4K/4X5haHelVXkVzLg7/QwKM1+edjpKY7cT6QwC1ppI7+y1VABusVKQ TP0/qlGf0kg0tULmQd6thmDeLWmwfwLYuwwpgENi21jlIIxRz0mmjwRVJ1K5mSM5iH 44grEsmiOinC+MkKeVfgRsDEXTjliBIHlfMWqHRA=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Ml6qM-1hcAHA3p88-00lVWb; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:42:20 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>, "rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <E1iGMu9-00055y-Ui@durif.tools.ietf.org> <8304e61d-c550-91ea-9e23-eef2cd31240b@gmx.de> <A3513970-EEB0-4DBD-9E6F-A87EBFAF886D@att.com> <de4feaff-8f71-cd38-545c-2d848749251b@levkowetz.com> <f00a671a-6fe4-f5ae-2582-0b78ffa1c256@gmx.de> <1f18382c-d830-b887-f5d3-3f376ae4fdd7@gmx.de> <B15F7AF0-F5A0-401A-9F6E-F7E0E466B6A7@amsl.com> <f4f1b7ba-127a-fbfa-531b-eeff03814281@gmx.de> <71bc8d39-d06c-d900-cc8e-04a48218d75f@gmail.com> <0905DADC-E9D5-47A7-B610-F8A62686D2BD@att.com> <07DBAE10-D1FA-45C4-B7A2-321B265CA302@amsl.com> <694c9244-98ae-1e64-39ef-8756d48b36ef@gmx.de> <860c663b-744f-a033-cc50-96088bb1b33c@gmx.de> <04DCBCE3-2C8C-4B03-9081-EF2B7A5C6087@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <7726840d-e51c-55a1-7cce-69574ec27b6c@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:42:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <04DCBCE3-2C8C-4B03-9081-EF2B7A5C6087@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lUVou8eJNRBnROmAGkcEZbRzj8FqZTXuQ8F0eq55JAJt/jMxN1X vgBkvRCqQGzwBRaXLZy9qOog5XnQLLMCkw1iJbakLEGPTsfmJN+KERlsFPNVHi+qYpizICW hbFOKjaQiwMHYssp6nQxjJCypco/ZrMiPw1MXrzbjDxSiDz8DojbpUg96snHF2nVrBAxukS iL9Ky8QMXVvAl0OdPWgqw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:w0YF5IUUjeM=:qqLSYGpRgWl6e6b3QhpD20 fKyRcO0Mzf1XKz1Z1AOtXa9IbBJ4/CtdAPDsr50f1ec/8J65B/llsQvwfsAGjVH8CwJTU6oKZ 4fs9OWn/MEzueDhW5CeJ/RTaigpmnjPZW3E3pv6sWvYTWeLbvHS6vxubfG2+uIZg2ErCtvTHR vCBoajFUoqwENSHxet2i3KsnE9NDg+ob+2HnXKNgHyFcoS0+KLaVknPLyXmHwJ0CNXZmRF79/ kNQZMsx1qX774LQokhYwG5F43bv7dVW+5T5cEipL7Px73Ot6pJ5zpbPjggqCjW0Hc36xa7Bi6 kejobZWynkQTMDkpCMednWKk/qz8hdPipMmELnRHcB4kVqdhtum2UU4ruE7B2WCRiWDwg//gg bCdB0qGPD0WG8hpT8mNwDxoPjxOEQLk7iBQqm+e5a7V0Rvh+UMmbIomG/CDhna67dir8vuPgA ZVAy7vjQGImlqOOi5u+wid01o6XNpQLxPyE3BXiV7Tp6LrMeZL7OWjP5HJjZ5MmZnzOwRUNuq vhCQlE/KBw1r3siZsb+mFGm5sGephCBSZrsDcuq33czAkrulXANT/uZCD0U8ndh0DE2+ooWm2 S387Ci4Dh2eUFXVmW903ddqQcYpAROEmPSCX8HXjcVWvXVt2H00T1xjzfvqIpRtHPk7DhroRa Ydw0/oPMnY9TTue6TA9hPmvM9rHyEctHlvuX8yPO08ksgjtguIfR1SbhBbC87JArWCmOPFiRe TCRFKR3Ftxfpa7i9HJkL5wxbg47GNnt5/5bOJwonVx6b4VbP7iyrYJNxc3CAaQhk6e8YBXfTY 6vPZRlqmgVv7TTSRtpV4GItAB9CGJaosGbvE9Gj/eletaN05hJs4hY5yCBouzh4UmMN3qHeDS FCpQAVuEyCbC24O3/fmMFLYdrWn41G7xQ8OhM6uF+Y0ertfpd99sNn5z6O9uIn68CoiipkRl8 zGduQTcP59z0ps26fS4cg6eBLDWvuN9l6W2TS7kGvVqv9aXPeG89qPqgqMCmg5H13fceOMHMO IPLqHEHqZQJLDsisW5HImZUAqSDDjxPmf0i3cn45y5dJvxIGNausJrT3B4HTxIiC/RYwko74X uU392boWDg1H6bbJEuvRQnkaFyDU9pJDoPHG9BlBMk2Fph3HSOxRgd1mxDsbz3javu9THVYWy vt2TWIzzZOjRV7POV5auhRil1ZhPEQrLqNISpYdm4XiXUbaIwi0gWwGsmq9xPYWvRcHvfRIEy QHZMEPkoevG0cUKID1hp9+3KcAo24anCeeMPgqBzNl9x0bTigHHl6JFB7xX8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/B4pxP3SXu1YruhTWUZCfXBvNNIQ>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc-dev] [xml2rfc] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:42:42 -0000

On 18.10.2019 13:33, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2019, at 12:36, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>; wrote:
>>
>> I note that there is one XML in AUTH48 using this (RFC 8668), so this
>> really is a bit pressing.
>
> This uses a &br; entity reference — we can easily change that entity into “<br />” later without touching the XML file :-)
>
> (I’m not finding the “rfc2629-xhtml.ent”, so maybe that already is the case.)
> ...

That's an interesting idea, but it would be in conflict with
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7998.html#dtd-removal>;.

Best regards, Julian