Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] [xml2rfc-dev] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 19 December 2019 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-markdown@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627EE1200B5; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:22:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jrrtVPqSApt; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A351120071; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:22:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1576754520; bh=32B1j0sq7hVL60BezzRqP2h97NMMGK8eC+1hOWKerJU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CZwn/sAf7XPKjJE5kUoHoNnegydS+k1bszmZTBKoXUlyzYJuJK68gA59KrpS6vYOX NKDjtJrnHQiv8sUk95+IjSTH7UF6GFnclg+Dl7tM+B13v1nZgRwenBsRDVjnVkmN+t aRWOfSW8r8DCjXF1XqWYzO3gfM4r2JNGjCitlRgY=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.61.78]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MBlxM-1iY1SO2X76-00C9k6; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:22:00 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: "rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
References: <E1iGMu9-00055y-Ui@durif.tools.ietf.org> <8304e61d-c550-91ea-9e23-eef2cd31240b@gmx.de> <A3513970-EEB0-4DBD-9E6F-A87EBFAF886D@att.com> <de4feaff-8f71-cd38-545c-2d848749251b@levkowetz.com> <f00a671a-6fe4-f5ae-2582-0b78ffa1c256@gmx.de> <1f18382c-d830-b887-f5d3-3f376ae4fdd7@gmx.de> <B15F7AF0-F5A0-401A-9F6E-F7E0E466B6A7@amsl.com> <f4f1b7ba-127a-fbfa-531b-eeff03814281@gmx.de> <71bc8d39-d06c-d900-cc8e-04a48218d75f@gmail.com> <0905DADC-E9D5-47A7-B610-F8A62686D2BD@att.com> <07DBAE10-D1FA-45C4-B7A2-321B265CA302@amsl.com> <694c9244-98ae-1e64-39ef-8756d48b36ef@gmx.de> <860c663b-744f-a033-cc50-96088bb1b33c@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <9c79bbb3-ab07-ea03-35ea-8540a865749d@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:21:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <860c663b-744f-a033-cc50-96088bb1b33c@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:stpooKziDXNX0BxeLv1LTUsga6rAo0S+WtK/bIwL38HwhX5m3D0 pGwV1zoZnqLF46Cke2Yi85o0937N2HpUQ9lEISu9wIK7gMWykbjIcUNb0kI4v/iZZQsq5jQ PeW7DURm6KSW5NYXSJrVwBICMsjwxdoxpfAbgyd6T3vzpabnkxKjvZ1XfefeL6bW0Nq430c 0L90BPoD0Ytsv8Ql0F5ww==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qWwCIp/c2Vw=:o9szOMrSE51KPb0Cb/khm2 v+uxOh8kfl+dV56kJNP//B4aUEWXsmtLCjgSytrzIKfztlZZ+WI0GNs/8rRJk/CxwPJBhVurp y/KagfrDLwPk19l86/G9bOfvFjT75feEPCrZj33R0suJadK1RBAUjnGyiDxoO/LgBp0uW9pWc 06aUAK4SjvboQWDySaW5jlqobTW1An7fGHII25rTotqehqM0e0e3Brh2VDLJt35RgUn+QWbrt LJiMetrvEcmMCIWW0uvEGGLvHprS+7ZbD91bForVKpC+UalcQtBUlquQyt9NuHuixK0bP4OYi OYRQFKYOOM3G+L94daq4iqoJJOsFunWx2Di2emK6UO8p3NzIrepBgndFB4JObo834fQ6eN8rT O0za/qlNM9s6XOD6ksRldb8X7jyVbz6WFDMCrCedf+sp/NMZ5vKfjkWzTJ7DDe6v5a7IO02fl Cw150QpnK4bsTRvPsmZpoFgtw5MCWTdP3Z5oNxvhQSzoBQ8K8Zv6OkpOiwqO61Ii/gmCCi91m DUBNN9iOPrm/Re+wPzbZHYNslLyeNtoysGpYdX1MTOoB4q8btUMCz4CLJV/zCKU6ozR5lMWAp w+bZxI23/HtaSJhMvR8UkpCio95PweKCv2nIkNqstPiYS8u5jSyua5jNUhY1AhId1tWuPs9tL CoRyTlvcIwZDY340qLBbe5myqilaJJHtuIVMm5Y2NEa/q2cXLMRvB38fQkOgqoA8y6O3qMIvG hdPyaOLaUo2flQiR4KwFVrVrdR4qVOBFO6L/SQgEwo4EyHseqXgCqiV8a5Ad+hKO02VF9vGfa jb20fm1ZubqFixIgG5Tq89kWrRsD1rSNhWH8QJxX7DddYPM/oxLwqjrjvEYkzO7B7XM48LuIs VmkNg9bl2TOhiYyO9GdZMxhx5YAMLp3VTb3MemaC62Wuq64gvyyqC1uI8ciY7GDd3gG/aLGmX Ddq5gwvQM/4q4LIRUL7OI4cGB/Uy9jwsitxJmPlCx6YN4IWf+7LhP6fvranAM+bgyKdaxNRFt b/dzARJYYk71CDmsnD95ptQRqDHPb6r940j0C8rRF/i8kp/317doV+sJypvTw/VNCP9izSOfQ t48M0llhO/tDuPZb/sNJ0WIX1L4lNrzCyZ8UD2LlwssiZ7AN3ZywUynms80L6DZK5KLCuaYYi P/86E4qV1reTdfR28LSVtz6aSNCfmQMhy837e6IUa9v48w0E5IYGJPSY8hw/MPPbptUQ576Uh 5OHJq49fUxOZo8lzf1YHxYdjhMc+NpchmnBsAXMcs8Ff5lPS5qx1OI7quVs4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-markdown/FQM8t6mM7LSyhrzeDYkAjVk9uH0>
Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [xml2rfc] [xml2rfc-dev] <br> is back, was: New xml2rfc release: v2.32.0
X-BeenThere: rfc-markdown@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "rfc-markdown is a discussion list for people writing I-Ds and RFCs in Markdown and the authors of the tools used for that." <rfc-markdown.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-markdown/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-markdown@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-markdown>, <mailto:rfc-markdown-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:22:19 -0000

On 18.10.2019 12:36, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 16.10.2019 20:01, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 08.10.2019 17:21, Sandy Ginoza wrote:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 7:20 PM, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com
>>>> <mailto:tony@att.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sandy, does the RPC feel that the ability to add a line break is
>>>> needed?
>>>
>>> Yes, the RPC would appreciate being able to use <br>.
>>> ...
>>
>> Just checking: absent <br/>, are you planning to use the Unicode escape
>> anytime soon? That would be a problem for the canonical XML, if we
>> decide to revert this change.
>> ...
>
> I note that there is one XML in AUTH48 using this (RFC 8668), so this
> really is a bit pressing.
> ...

OK, this is *really* frustrating.

We've discussed this *specific* problem for over two months. We knew the
RFC is in AUTH48. We agreed that <br> would be better here.

However, the RFC has been published as is, putting things into
"canonical XML" which are both undocumented and controversial.

Best regards, Julian