Re: [Rfced-future] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-06: (with COMMENT)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2022 19:40 UTC

To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter@ietf.org, rfced-future@iab.org
References: <164665069847.9050.2828864553531861371@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <829c4059-52fc-f5fe-c2f7-12baa931c139@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:39:57 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <164665069847.9050.2828864553531861371@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/oCzlfoRiE0aVVh6nRq3Zi-_nRfw>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-06: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Rob,

On 07-Mar-22 23:58, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
...
  
> Hi,
> 
>     Note that RFC 2850 states that the RFC Editor appoints a liaison
>     member to the IAB.  This does not change, but refers to the RFC
>     Editor function as described in [I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model].
> 
> It isn't entirely clear to me exactly who (as in which person or body) is
> actually responsible for appointing a liaison member to the IAB (given, as per
> draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model, the RFC editor function responsibilities are
> split up into multiple entities).  My assumption is that this would be RSAB,
> but perhaps I mistaken.  Would it be helpful to clarify this - perhaps in
> draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model?

Indeed, I don't think it belongs in the IAB charter. Hence I suggest that this
is really a comment that the IAB Program (in Cc:) should look at.

    Brian

Re: [Rfced-future] Robert Wilton's No Objection o… Brian E Carpenter