IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rfced-future] Fwd: Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 01 March 2022 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AF63A0A06 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:58:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=DW1i5eAj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=czMFPiBn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odfi7SkJdC1l for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212933A081F for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B363201F5F; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:58:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 13:58:30 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=ug5Ag1iiHBPK9N SY0/FfhsB98fC9iR2t+cZUBRrMu94=; b=DW1i5eAj6A5mRkWtlp2ajnIXY5xEby RLG/u9hLaYtshg+W2NOrR7DztOeTsRptpccWcFEO8CEJ7UX8iBe8Gwo7jqGPzCpl QKnvGbcWsWES30+BDFqgLBFCXeCAvV0VpJnKRwqT8/lewB4oKZWc9+jaAxReIu9L orC0hmmLP2ApVXKGaGZP9j563XoLdc3Mii7OgtlQ1Z67yRE0mamU9nOHJqP54iv8 G0MOQg/ft/SJxhV47Es0rZy7aAYB1ZdD3nPOwnfj1KbkmSrFQXXG3/71+r2uiBVB 2xQXedngpBYoBeaCwFH2E+XrGZOVrMMXT5z7GJ0Kq6bAl6OI0ueBrBbQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=ug5Ag1iiHBPK9NSY0/FfhsB98fC9iR2t+cZUBRrMu94=; b=czMFPiBn AvgqmX5/PQ8xQpBIO1R20R0/Ib8rqmyK2J/YjrGRYuXd2kQA+30dphlE6KZhempL t8Jnpq/FqrJvE6H0/iKOFW9f032Ptqfr8VzGsqSeAo4TuS6XZdO43giZCDJ/QbLf a6NzQz6qe8TuxD2Iw8hcPGZN1/rw9hXTpm2OO2PpnFfrjk9i1RIv9l5UCkUVf0mg kr8nKniCsS3F2wUp08xB2TSatyEJlpNJzD70q5GYz/ggD3/ssBEfk+fwn7JmbNld v1o4zPDN5fbtBvXiv2XtyT9JtlWoHWjLPwDboPRo4elD4OuybiLOpLNyrjRVAGQe oK8D2XsmrzZmtw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:1WweYkbhR8qcclqGFIqPhp7hdfAJC1VH_TRxXPNXyMpCkeE3gA-Ulg> <xme:1WweYvbqfV3XmuST-xSnZFwO-LVcOdnuR358jyvfP6gi3XDSZx_1Rih1pn6f9mZem jq5mBVxEUDxiFBcNw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:1WweYu9m3tWHGO83C0rRi3xpn7PQeUK5I6idBNYoPoKDad4tgjMYfILb1f6dzVYDy228JFSIn4Blp0_umFzX9hEimL8YsmBdk93rdxQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtvddgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfufhfvffhjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgvrhcuufgrihhnthdqtehnughrvgcuoehsthhp vghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfduvdetudekfe fgtefgudffjeetgfeihffgkeekveehjeeiffduudegtdehgeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvth gvrhdrihhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1WweYur5Y0tu9MFIjrVj-bjrucCSB9r-kn49EOtgRU8v4BuDFiVURQ> <xmx:1WweYvpoFXiRkHEI75mlF8HJxeGqsHLgHblopqWJbmlxF74ds8Qgzg> <xmx:1WweYsTqzHA24GfHiz6_7u2qgnWdgi81M5Z5w60BHMSTbysAtfwaDg> <xmx:1WweYuTScS1-UWKfupXX6mB7npC_QhB_wFp9Brnc36ugiZ3MWYjOyg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:58:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <113a58dc-ab33-8861-556e-5d7e34337a30@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:58:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
References: <f7c2b9d8-4395-776b-80ea-1d0dfc00bb7c@stpeter.im>
To: "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <f7c2b9d8-4395-776b-80ea-1d0dfc00bb7c@stpeter.im>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <f7c2b9d8-4395-776b-80ea-1d0dfc00bb7c@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/wKhRm3ofzLeHcUyBTzEtgKCVYak>
Subject: [Rfced-future] Fwd: Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 18:58:36 -0000

I somehow dropped the program list from this reply...


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:52:33 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
CC: draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model.all@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, 
last-call@ietf.org

Hi Stig, thanks for your review.

On 2/24/22 7:00 PM, Stig Venaas via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Stig Venaas
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> I have reviewed the document and it is in good shape.
> 
> The document has a few nits found by the idnits tool. The string "RFC" should
> not be included when specifing "obsoletes:" or "updates:". Also the abstract
> mentions that the documents obsoletes or updates documents that are not listed
> by the obsoletes/updates headers.

Hmm, I don't see that...

    Obsoletes: RFC8728 (if approved)
    Updates: RFC7841, RFC8729, RFC8730 (if approved)

and...

    This document obsoletes [RFC8728] by defining version 3 of the RFC
    Editor Model.  This document updates [RFC7841] by defining
    boilerplate text for the Editorial Stream.  This document updates
    [RFC8729] by replacing the RFC Editor role with the RSWG, RSAB, and
    RSCE.  This document updates [RFC8730] by removing the dependency on
    certain policies specified by the IAB and RSE.

> In 3.1.1.4. paragraph 4:
> "participation for those unable to to attend in person."
> Double "to".

It seems that you reviewed -10, not -11 (which is the latest), since 
that exact text is in -10 but not -11.

> I'm wondering whether any of the references should be normative, but it may not
> make sense for this document.

Indeed we concluded that it didn't make sense for this document.

Thanks!

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email