IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 01 March 2022 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C69B3A0A10; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:00:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=gD6K5Y76; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VlmwZYjY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5KIrvZx7xiIN; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:00:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2133A0A13; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:00:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239743201F5F; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:00:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:00:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=KmITpAohgI1hBC fzSdmDSVp5xoCBvyuw6RgplzSpQ9o=; b=gD6K5Y76ekxHvaNFBFC3Q2tYodKxoU ps8n8LGWtK/t9r9zMhcrRuvCNm2s4lGNp+nUmR7Gjc37jwZ5BhmBN9QoZrBBrwNF ZWPtoSbuL2XbZlBl5gx3XqL5/uGKUPPqRsJ7nbeIu2LTvzMT1P+cTXIKpgc1dmZs HD0tSP2nQArBWVdkCwbPkN4K5r5dLdDWFlQXlQ+TKRzaD0NUfw/MI81K/mvSR4Gi x0MMKEGk5Q+jC0aj9ikpKpfX1zNxFtSTjUOBXuSz2eazT77LRjl6Nux97tLO9bfW C/3KFeSO87uswOhUCMKg4jgYoqMUwbf4hG3L+6k7WrNBvvYwKr0u6TrQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=KmITpAohgI1hBCfzSdmDSVp5xoCBvyuw6RgplzSpQ 9o=; b=VlmwZYjYMxyrq43CWgGkBmbQM6b5NAwMx472q2mH5QHK3IrFwzGrAmJ/U IB6qP10G4Gx5toKooKC/JVI9kI63rJ2NZyvPdhW29E0+UfnkaG4yoI7cMWsMHSgB SgLGP7CyvM62ePCtmr8gonxikrHLOEGpQgc4Q5dhGygBhGX8adhKrWiLkaTwP0vn g/iCDRPH0P7ximrLrlzl8EVV8Mgtciy/KNCdh7OF/upIFnqDfHhRkEUoeYnWmkgb lRVda2z06j3fwB9sNgoZb6LPG4FAYOP6Du9CX9sttGNCI8lEie7FLDesLYyoliII 2F200/UA505FxMGaG4HcaEBqtrysw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:V20eYg0xBqh_w8m48aMdB49SwKSA50jOq_dC8HgTtLAT_wc8oIgaxA> <xme:V20eYrGspuBBk1aJJweSR6pZKjk2MCDP-Oo7OeY7LsWJWGjTidMXcG6MCvowN5030 VBRiQ00eaiNrglLmA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:V20eYo7lqg66dOhxMgErX998hiVOQfSM8EBn70nixCe4DUIk8cKNC_v4SU5UmxfzzqVQYL4_hRZ0O5KnsU9otiB8W4r4oT1oGNvnKcg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtvddguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfurghinhhtqdetnhgurhgvuceoshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvthgvrhdrihhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehtefhvdejvdfhgeetgefhfeeuudefkeetvdfhkeelleeu heefleekkeekieffudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:V20eYp29zNApkDkM_oQMuqLKhRsrVtTQY1Lf421KK9-ARA6UgRj-Ng> <xmx:V20eYjGOhwgMZnLYLMg4KnDFaHYoOAGbk9ZHbg7pFzDhxiaLIdO8UA> <xmx:V20eYi8tin9GE3oPymLnqVjGQ4lvGu0eZNpcZkvZJnlEfFiNs1Vmqw> <xmx:V20eYni_S8gJ3igX0T-T53uL5ucdirXQ2eu2OeiqnNVC3jTZbAuORQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:00:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <a150ec33-7228-26a5-f5e1-b7464e27c6c5@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:00:35 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>
References: <74AF211B-741E-46FC-9E35-8015D5254515@icann.org> <f55fba34-c449-8566-0423-147fc1fa3363@lear.ch> <0c1711fe-bc05-e6b0-2f94-eb1c24ae3766@stpeter.im> <CABcZeBPqGHt0KD4tjQZFd7SVRwQHVa7fj7wJ_LYCn-3XQKjfjg@mail.gmail.com> <01D06884-9136-49EB-AE2F-904EBAEB2BE5@icann.org>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <01D06884-9136-49EB-AE2F-904EBAEB2BE5@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/ZtOVVswSPlqAK9WnkIQmagNGjY8>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:00:49 -0000

On 3/1/22 11:56 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> On Mar 1, 2022, at 10:45 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>> Here is a proposed change:
>>>
>>> OLD
>>>
>>>      The RSAB seeks
>>>      such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to the rfc-interest
>>>      mailing list or to its successor or future equivalent.
>>>
>>> NEW
>>>
>>>      The RSAB seeks
>>>      such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to the mailing list of
>>>      the RSWG (which should supersede the current rfc-interest list).
>>>
>> I actually don't agree with this. I think the WG should have a separate list
>> that is moderated by the chairs. The rfc-interest list can continue, but
>> I think the new model deserves a new list.
>>
> 
> Personal view: the RSWG list should not be moderated, just like IETF WG lists are not moderated. This will surely be painful, with lots of strongly-held views supported only by predictions of the future, but that's also true for a fair number of IETF WG lists.
> 
> I read the proposed "(which should supersede the current rfc-interest list)" to mean that the new list will have a new name. Maybe better wording would be:
> 
>      The RSAB seeks
>      such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to the mailing list of
>      the RSWG, and the current rfc-interest list will be closed for
>      submissions and archived.

Personally, I don't care deeply about whether we keep rfc-i or close and 
archive it (I can see arguments either way), but I'll update the I-D to 
reflect consensus from this thread. :-)

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email