Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 01 March 2022 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DC3A0C88; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtA4nb5rSRjH; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DFA3A0C51; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id n15so12087978plf.4; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:54:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NtzK0E6lCvXtJVww32pzmWZQUYvK8bIbb42FC/QJU8g=; b=jZyt7zyRUHspY2zt7Lcu9xHDZW+IGblYLUoULgMJjWWdAb9y0fE4yg8ArYUwDf3C4j SWZMTvwuKbneQpmGNYpzwuN8/jOqs/EUr8VNGwIXE5kbwImp8zgRWUePElZE8dltqKFv YN38bDPobbfngnxLJXWLUIJPw3ajoEV2X5SDDT51RVO3XxjZakXeWdDUuokar/CTqHvy mRSVhAhWAFy8uVo10sXzRlIdlWFO7BKzbFC08GLfs4WaRWIafzFxkBkgpI3SuYwKszew 4vYwhDPCI/IjsYjOfbZuC+peXOvpkZKk43raaTOM0UgAEreDuaIfsW6cx0y0tVdFpnTl 4D5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NtzK0E6lCvXtJVww32pzmWZQUYvK8bIbb42FC/QJU8g=; b=jPGCEAZXqpPCiPo/4nsCg/xbXlWnKmPyWHJdY3uIvu7TxJS5wNd1MkRBXr03RJI1Wg dqXc3ncvz1nHtvbWdqVc3+NOdlPuFDlRfCJfVBHDtS/ZXRCK6+4CjdFXl/sJ1FZairrO 71XZKt7EmLRlVCkhVZspCz8NE+lNE1z90sD9H2O/YXZmS19/C4lA2bybwoHrMv4En+k/ uweCVW3ywvgnS2fyklrZF2Guw+g6r+FPOqIvzikFFepitfCniZ35VLH81IZQS2x+EkN+ B3exLgLjyR6aQT83MVKhBRRTKVA6g+aYoFvgWVnuJDvjna3s8lKGO6RJ5+JV416qAa8x 73OQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530D0VT3cltqeEaeDPn7aY8LLl6k5g2K4ZoQ3d3eLCQx8DrdaSg5 MY5h0twKaKUmJR7HE/NKYYk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIuZLzCPYEzmWn4jwoy3gl6kjunGqNOtwjpmTH7GXLTfi9aB7vlwwoTGIkOvOAFzFf4nBMWQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:281:b0:14c:f3b3:209b with SMTP id j1-20020a170903028100b0014cf3b3209bmr26817192plr.87.1646164483665; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2-20020a655582000000b00372b2b5467asm13657237pgs.10.2022.03.01.11.54.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:54:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: "rfced-future@iab.org" <rfced-future@iab.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
References: <74AF211B-741E-46FC-9E35-8015D5254515@icann.org> <f55fba34-c449-8566-0423-147fc1fa3363@lear.ch> <0c1711fe-bc05-e6b0-2f94-eb1c24ae3766@stpeter.im> <CABcZeBPqGHt0KD4tjQZFd7SVRwQHVa7fj7wJ_LYCn-3XQKjfjg@mail.gmail.com> <de6c4153-ebed-47e2-7657-3ad7f917dd73@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <2ca3cad7-e3cd-6c81-c246-1b4afa68ee0e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 08:54:38 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <de6c4153-ebed-47e2-7657-3ad7f917dd73@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/p7iOK6Vb84wbaHdcSsi_hclVZw0>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:54:57 -0000
(sorry for resend, my comment is below) On 02-Mar-22 07:52, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/1/22 11:45 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:36 AM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im >> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote: >> >> On 2/10/22 7:42 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: >> > Hi Paul, >> > >> > >> > On 09.02.22 17:46, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> >> Greetings again. The structures proposed in this document seem >> like a >> >> very good way forward. The level of detail about the >> expectations on >> >> each group is a good balance in prescriptiveness. >> >> >> >> Two small thoughts on the current draft: >> >> >> >> The future status of the rfc-interest mailing list is unclear; see >> >> Section 3.2.3. Given it s current contents, I could see that it >> would >> >> easily become a parallel track for discussions that should be on >> the >> >> RSWG mailing list. It might be good to close (and certainly >> archive!) >> >> rfc-interest unless it becomes more moderated by someone pointing >> >> discussions to the RSWG. >> > >> > I like the idea of at least having some RSWG participation to point >> > people to the right place, when necessary. >> >> Keeping the rfc-interest list and starting a new list for the RSWG >> might >> indeed lead to confusion. >> >> Here is a proposed change: >> >> OLD >> >> The RSAB seeks >> such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to the rfc-interest >> mailing list or to its successor or future equivalent. >> >> NEW >> >> The RSAB seeks >> such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to the mailing >> list of >> the RSWG (which should supersede the current rfc-interest list). >> >> >> I actually don't agree with this. I think the WG should have a separate list >> that is moderated by the chairs. The rfc-interest list can continue, but >> I think the new model deserves a new list. > > Can we specify (at a high level) what topics are appropriate for > rfc-interest as opposed to the RSWG list? Would we envision that rfc-i > is more for implementers? We already have a plethora of lists (rfc-i, > tools-discuss, xml2rfc-dev, etc.) and it's already unclear where certain > topics should be discussed. Please not. I don't think we should cover such operational details at all. (Do you realise that RFC2026 refers to anonymous FTP and gopher?) How about being *less* specific: The RSAB seeks such input by, at a minimum, sending a notice to relevant mailing lists. Brian
- [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfce… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Rfced-future] Comments on draft-iab-rfcefdp-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Rfced-future] [Ext] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Rfced-future] [IAB] Comments on draft-iab-rf… Eliot Lear