IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] labeling/experiments/ and ramifications

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 04 July 2018 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66875131055 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIxhkvSL0R24 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377A6130E6D for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-5e1ff70000003bbf-4e-5b3d05c46d81
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id AE.83.15295.5C50D3B5; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:37:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w64Hb7YR009987; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:37:07 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w64Hb3Bm022074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:37:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:37:03 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180704173703.GJ60996@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <f609948a-9240-3fe4-8538-e694aab1edb0@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMo3VFZWMVfGrYV_LLD0oHSQJQV20uhoO2KsV-7HWdGnw@mail.gmail.com> <be67344f-bb7f-f6c3-dff2-9c777e472b2e@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMmGb=WyvL2L5U05LeTcDPeXBxf5N-21tTwPLsP__PSNw@mail.gmail.com> <2c8871ae-f4c4-40bd-296a-f52b4adbe385@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <2c8871ae-f4c4-40bd-296a-f52b4adbe385@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrHuU1Tba4PcZLosVr8+xW5x4vZzF 4uX2OgdmjxPLrrB6LFnyk8lj8uM25gDmKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6Mn30PWQtucVQ8ebSVuYGx k72LkZNDQsBE4uTKb4xdjFwcQgKLmSS2LN3IDJIQEtjAKNH1qA4icYVJYv2uO2AdLAIqEmc2 bgWz2YDshu7LYA0iAgYS/Uc7wOLMAmYSv+5eZgOxhQWcJNpu3GIEsXmBtn34dJoVYugGJomW N+vZIBKCEidnPmGBaFaX+DPvEtBQDiBbWmL5Pw6IsLxE89bZYLs4BWwleg9+ZgKxRQWUJfb2 HWKfwCg4C8mkWUgmzUKYNAvJpAWMLKsYZVNyq3RzEzNzilOTdYuTE/PyUot0DfVyM0v0UlNK NzGCA12SZwfjmTdehxgFOBiVeHgNztlEC7EmlhVX5h5ilORgUhLlld9oHS3El5SfUpmRWJwR X1Sak1p8iFGCg1lJhFfzF1A5b0piZVVqUT5MSpqDRUmcN3sRY7SQQHpiSWp2ampBahFMVoaD Q0mCdz+LbbSQYFFqempFWmZOCUKaiYMTZDgP0PArIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4yWHC8W9Uxi5ui5 NwVI/nk/dRKzEEtefl6qlDhvJUiDAEhDRmke3ExQ4pLI3l/zilEc6EVh3ocgVTzApAc39RXQ QiaghT3bLEEWliQipKQaGPOvNdw+skzj2P1zy0+eU9Tkck8puCtmstLR6OQXB/ub4su0f1zn ap3Yu23Cj6ec266a7HfMyxLM90y6/7J0zi7+f6xrHgSaq+WtP3I7kks/Zr+3oHruRsu1L9Q6 yh7s9VzqVv586ytGZ8WcY3HLBDJWPcyMypmhemm2fNHNRR1iIZXLP7w+u0GJpTgj0VCLuag4 EQCNj+u9NwMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/fQafd_R8Je7bE5qNGGUv1so5EvA>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] labeling/experiments/ and ramifications
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 17:37:13 -0000

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 07:32:53PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi EKR,
> 
> 
> On 04.07.18 19:02, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> > I would note that
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/
> > encodes this practice and it's currently in the RFC-Ed queue, so if
> > you object, you ought to do it soon.
> >
> 
> That seems a bit late.  If ALL you're saying in that document is,
> “specification required”, no reason to stall that draft if it's in the
> RFC Editor queue. 

Currently live at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype-values.xhtml :

Note
The role of the designated expert is described in 
[RFC-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-05]. The designated expert 
[RFC8126] ensures that the specification is publicly available.  An 
Internet Draft that is posted and never published or a standard in 
another standards body, industry consortium, university site, etc. 
suffices.  The expert may provide more in depth reviews, but their 
approval should not be taken as an endorsement of the extension.   

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email