IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfcplusplus] labeling/experiments/ and ramifications

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 04 July 2018 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918B9130DE3 for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0m8G2VV7oU8P for <rfcplusplus@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB071130DCD for <rfcplusplus@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w64JV3jS026178; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:31:03 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC8722048; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:31:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717A722042; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:31:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (86-120-69-50.rdsnet.ro [86.120.69.50] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w64JV1qe015431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:31:02 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Benjamin Kaduk' <kaduk@mit.edu>, 'Eliot Lear' <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: 'Eric Rescorla' <ekr@rtfm.com>, rfcplusplus@ietf.org
References: <f609948a-9240-3fe4-8538-e694aab1edb0@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMo3VFZWMVfGrYV_LLD0oHSQJQV20uhoO2KsV-7HWdGnw@mail.gmail.com> <be67344f-bb7f-f6c3-dff2-9c777e472b2e@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMmGb=WyvL2L5U05LeTcDPeXBxf5N-21tTwPLsP__PSNw@mail.gmail.com> <2c8871ae-f4c4-40bd-296a-f52b4adbe385@cisco.com> <20180704173703.GJ60996@kduck.kaduk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180704173703.GJ60996@kduck.kaduk.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 20:30:58 +0100
Message-ID: <03c401d413cd$89a40c00$9cec2400$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQCltZWAD1jt8JRyeJyxh84BbYvxGwFd22XJAd6+dj0B+ErpzwG5BibuAe227FCmlVII8A==
X-Originating-IP: 86.120.69.50
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23948.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--25.949-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--25.949-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23948.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--25.949400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 1GZI+iG+MtfZfnct5UBzcVYH5oZvsyJ4myqQJWNsukkoQueHSn6dgMLm p4jPUF8tAWMdzSV1Iwb2mhGQByUXXuFokojhrXL/JrUxoq6hvw+dpfncOF/0WRHfiujuTbedyE9 OxUqh9b9NqDqh5NJ43uQB9gS0XiouYhdzVnzdRn1wUSK4/EeOxcWmFF22SfTePILl10bYlyAans FgOu2thrcfsuZWVAS3S2Rr+mzYSq/pzoZfJABOupRrnSy7UTtbGW6TfocNCnsfTpbqvC281Uene 5ELSwGvII20fGkZ4zIu7f845UEBB4aMgxBwJcDYqbg9uWhLYLd1k+gP1XamtJsoi2XrUn/JIq95 DjCZh0y93aL9exgp0lZ0V5tYhzdWxEHRux+uk8jpP8tMOyYmaA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/yaIz_RzTbXad-4PLhrsM59QVQOI>
Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] labeling/experiments/ and ramifications
X-BeenThere: rfcplusplus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: For discussion of the RFC++ BoF proposal and related ideas <rfcplusplus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfcplusplus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus>, <mailto:rfcplusplus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 19:31:10 -0000

Well, I am not that bothered, but it looks like you should have used "Expert Review" with the strictures and guidance to the Designated Experts, rather than "Specification Required" with an (implicit) alteration of 8126 and the I-D boilerplate.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rfcplusplus [mailto:rfcplusplus-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> Kaduk
> Sent: 04 July 2018 18:37
> To: Eliot Lear
> Cc: Eric Rescorla; rfcplusplus@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Rfcplusplus] labeling/experiments/ and ramifications
> 
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 07:32:53PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
> > Hi EKR,
> >
> >
> > On 04.07.18 19:02, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > >
> > > I would note that
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/
> > > encodes this practice and it's currently in the RFC-Ed queue, so if
> > > you object, you ought to do it soon.
> > >
> >
> > That seems a bit late.  If ALL you're saying in that document is,
> > “specification required”, no reason to stall that draft if it's in the
> > RFC Editor queue.
> 
> Currently live at
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype-
> values.xhtml :
> 
> Note
> The role of the designated expert is described in
> [RFC-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-05]. The designated expert
> [RFC8126] ensures that the specification is publicly available.  An
> Internet Draft that is posted and never published or a standard in
> another standards body, industry consortium, university site, etc.
> suffices.  The expert may provide more in depth reviews, but their
> approval should not be taken as an endorsement of the extension.
> 
> -Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rfcplusplus mailing list
> Rfcplusplus@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email