Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 September 2019 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B2E12002F; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jO3PACXO4O3h; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7AC12008A; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id n197so12913038iod.9; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rssw4f07aYQNWW/9ZtaquhrwwaKmb+cjHRpfUZYvXCs=; b=bQFzbjd4dNm2cctDaeoUfeB9yyi7VoRju+BTbHTpgbe5WDMQxdmFYu4gXBppqA0AIy 8r3NdgcldRT4QfX00wqQPYfXyFB0Euhwzy43b57L0nV9qEm5I+jyMY89vCtSeC77BE+f BFAJcA8Vg30NMUq6f0B3W97TYsmaqV8m+/GgIJ7bsagTUleF1+70UzQyiupcd/wqgAIY PZl2K8st75nvNvz1rqkxTRS84KnzXq+7QOGA3h2TBl9PrJg2JYh9y4+7tBujCzoJeTNv 7l3YOPOx2ZA4Q6q92ZjBFV4kkwgzhgK05bhmlNlZ2kGJK/kyl43jtnGMgr2zssPug+qJ ZxCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rssw4f07aYQNWW/9ZtaquhrwwaKmb+cjHRpfUZYvXCs=; b=imLrsAanOJu/MKXPsYRz98QXqw2H6w01c/q2rlEU7Eigi7chxqpqyyZ8nsHdoItmO7 s1kxztseK7WIbUbhnlc0lszXnPdXt8pQXhGBp/KD96l7FcfCR/2ksKLfQ8Hzk66860nb nUnL+vlhoZzKsURfNS89V1QhcN5ovNCUw8T2G0rrYh9gbcBmBD0O9ir6hBBQldqigu2T Z6y+UIvnlol+Yo0fk+d/xXWtqflYvrO/8wUigzRYHVQf1p5ytxcd1jchaSukYMUz/y1a pbpdmhxR4hE8QjGXjNRP5hYbny4qPQx4slqbYlbLxPxt/1/55IC3ThI383Z7UMCV+pF8 DBsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVmgxiG47VtFPPWj38fkO9Wk3F4Tqs8gzZ+zg8i94dHMi0FmBrH LCaAS4Srgg5L5sI2G8yatp2QpukIXIh/lhYkEuY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxY4VmpX5IqlMpKlBjGVi0oWkVrnb3Y2NcinY6bnt3fuRHNGcYDJDWZTPnJDEh1+gUXN8xcadpTCf9yOJ0aepM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9557:: with SMTP id a23mr16765186ios.165.1568950636647; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM5PR05MB35489E9A98D0A9508C9158CAD4B30@DM5PR05MB3548.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAM+vMER+GGtZnUdk7LauEYEMJMg=BLRbJ40=1FRZxUQ77O8SRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM+vMER+GGtZnUdk7LauEYEMJMg=BLRbJ40=1FRZxUQ77O8SRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:36:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMWHDXHgWyKz5AiGeuVZ0LHYMv+pB=NMjuaG+UUcMZrNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e1a120592f3c92a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/0VpvFOUQ3M5p0JvtM1xGdCvp0_g>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WGLC, IPR and Implementation polling for draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 03:37:20 -0000

open source in

https://github.com/brunorijsman/rift-python

this is currently -07 version which is almost same as -08 (will be pulled
up shortly). Officially interoped at -07 level with Juniper (check IETF
proceedings for presos/docs). Best to learn the protocol, muck around,
contribute. Quite complete and extremely cleanly written.

Juniper's implementation (standalone packages for Linux and OSX) as free
download under

https://www.juniper.net/us/en/dm/free-rift-trial/

I'm aware of other efforts going on for a bit but no'one posted anything
yet

thanks

--- tony



On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:26 PM GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Support
>
> Can anyone point me the prototype code link?  I would like to see the
> functions how to fly.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Gang
>
> Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <zzhang=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>;
> 于2019年9月14日周六 上午3:40写道:
>
>> Hi RIFTers,
>>
>> This email starts WG Last Call, IPR and implementation polling  for our
>> base spec draft-ietf-rift-rift-08. It ends on 9/27.
>>
>> Please thoroughly review the document and voice your support/objection.
>>
>> If you’re a co-author/contributor, please explicitly respond to this
>> email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed
>> IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and
>> Contributors.
>>
>> If you're not a co-author/contributor, you need to respond only if you
>> are aware of any relevant IPR not yet disclosed in conformance with IETF
>> rules.
>>
>> Currently disclosed IPRs can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rift-rift
>> .
>>
>> We are also polling for any existing implementation.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jeff and Jeffrey
>>
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> From: RIFT <rift-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda
>> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 3:06 AM
>> To: rift@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Rift] LC version -08
>>
>> LC ready version -08 has been posted
>>
>> Last few small changes based on input of people playing with both
>> implementations in different scenarios
>>
>> * A new prefix tie type has been added
>> PositiveExternalDisaggregationPrefixTIEType since it is necessary to
>> distinguish between normal prefix and external prefix being disaggregated
>> to preserve priorities in complex redistribution scenarios. BTW, negative
>> prefixes are always least preferred and hence they don't need to
>> differentiate.
>> * Link pair carries now indication whether BFD is up 9on the link. This
>> allows at the top of the fabric not only see links that are secured and
>> outer keys but also whether link is BFD protected/BFD is up
>> * NodeCapabilities are required now and minor protocol version is carried
>> since there was no possiblity on adjacency building to check which minor
>> verswion the peer speaks (major is carried in the envelope). Major version
>> compatibility allows to aways decode the model but minor could be used in
>> the future to understand minor schema variations
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --- tony
>> _______________________________________________
>> RIFT mailing list
>> RIFT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RIFT mailing list
> RIFT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>