IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rmcat] call for comments on draft-ietf-rmcat-app-interaction-00

Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9892C1A8BC3 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iz9SLdlsvoY0 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2031A8BC2 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y10so3150192wgg.15 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tieto.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=D/5zJBBRu5VhBNwww6I0Th4EHAZW9rz2GGejCrQv8IQ=; b=QEOXexkGYtCw50JH2xx5VK8tdLInjfjH+/1VXhWTTnf+Cx+SMl9Psj3UYSBEZnsZ1h ahKDK94whcZLqc2rMceVhxpn2fp8+ZQG5XEHhcTw+bL//7VvdtBCRbgRfy+VdIpfUFrK ZZ94IYgpmbINXWWcnwG0+eJ1LNMdwVTIKoyP0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=D/5zJBBRu5VhBNwww6I0Th4EHAZW9rz2GGejCrQv8IQ=; b=nA8A7k+XJBypeLx3ZR9DVCkm6TTsV14O/mPdnqz0JIk9uxkRPiUdYNsCAltOtiO98/ U+uPa1GaOoDbJDRTzIloV0J0T+fXxARPWIh206COvv/RSJy0k/RpwKrrb/JKZYYHIzkm p7QbHqq1S39GwohluGh2n3S3qo7zFq6tOhRDs3dYamrhYcbi9HfFoP0K+LdcLvmCLvOx RCNGrhJjFa4BPLuPjUZnnJHRggI+F+Fi5HTLv87Ir8EZ66n567OyoWpodZw4jrtzPYNf ziowQL+oX3OVbp1oI/e4bVuP7W0opEVBblshZ4LmXGaKX1b4Outu7ziALrQWHbKmg9Y8 ghtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8FI4F4fD2wyFQ4Ps6YPqyL7zp2mOWW3iZxCMynWfR9M33cICAuwE2+5ZwGYYiXhu9Be3uvp8cDh9UbsmWU/TnQeOROknFjbyw1jU9cr68UsujpsM=
X-Received: by 10.194.161.166 with SMTP id xt6mr50844922wjb.1.1413968760167; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 02:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac/t12R9c799MkcoSqq0oj+grkzezQ==
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:05:59 +0200
Message-ID: <cdb98b4e0c34f901536cf9a0a6d7e9da@mail.gmail.com>
To: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-DomainID: tieto.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/6mcdG07OprzaKy5dIAY52CXWYP8
Cc: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, draft-ietf-rmcat-app-interaction@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [rmcat] call for comments on draft-ietf-rmcat-app-interaction-00
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:06:02 -0000

Hi,

In order to progress the wg document on application interactions we and
the authors of the doc would like to call for people, CC designers in
particular, to
read the document and provide comments with focus on the following
aspects:

  1. Scope of document: Which interfaces are we looking to have described
in this document - especially should the document only describe the
interface in between the RMCAT Congestion controller and the application
or should the document provide an more extensive description of the
various components and their interrelations - still likely with a special
emphasis on  the RMCAT Congestion controller and the application/codec
interface - ?

 This was discussed already at IETF89 RMCAT session (see minutes) - this
is an attempt to recap this discussion in order to establish consensus.

  2. What (given the scope assumed for 1.) are the top 3-4 interactions
(e.g., allowed rate)   that matter the most and which are needed to be
described in the document ?

Thanks.

BR, Karen/Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email