Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada

Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se> Tue, 18 July 2017 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=03724e32fd=anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0007C126B71; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IPDDvYKq0jyx; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tiger.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777AB1200F3; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Flohr, Julius" <julius.flohr@uni-due.de>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
CC: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rmcat-nada@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rmcat-nada@ietf.org>
References: <7c5453a5-65f6-6f74-6214-346469c8abce@kau.se> <c8d9ec64-c332-fa8d-dd20-3dd307aabb97@kau.se> <DB4PR07MB348F7D8702DC16028081554C2D70@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <62513FF8-0A36-45FC-878C-7D03A1772A2A@uni-due.de>
From: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
Message-ID: <6ca96a44-0ca2-2704-41f6-3eaeaf35afa7@kau.se>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:18:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <62513FF8-0A36-45FC-878C-7D03A1772A2A@uni-due.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-ClientProxiedBy: Exch-A1.personal.kau (130.243.19.82) To Exch-A2.personal.kau (130.243.19.83)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/8d2tpPX-XfoqnzGl-RKqHQJwM6k>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:19:07 -0000


On 2017-07-18 10:59, Flohr, Julius wrote:
>> On 4. Jul 2017, at 13:50, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>> Page 8, computation of d_tilde : I mentioned it before and it is also stated in the scream draft. I fear that the non-linear warping can be quite prone to create self-inflicted congestion and I recall that examples of this has been shown, and it was also dicussed  ?. If you agree with this, then it can be good to elaborate a bit around these risks in the draft.
> Hi,
>
> I have updated my simulation model to the latest version of the draft. This is definitely true and the recent changes have made the situation worse, especially for links with small bandwidth and long queues.

Hi Julius,

Thanks for trying out the latest version of the draft! I am curious as 
to how different your results were between the two versions?

Thanks,
Anna

>
> Regards,
>
> Julius
>
> =====================================
> Julius Flohr, M.Sc.
> University of Duisburg-Essen
> Computer Networking Technology Group
>
> Room SL-408
> Schützenbahn 70
> D-45326 Essen/Germany
>
> E-Mail:  julius.flohr@uni-due.de
> Phone: +49-201-183-7667
> Fax:     +49-201-183-7673
> =====================================
>