Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN
Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com> Thu, 03 December 2015 14:37 UTC
Return-Path: <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EA01A88F3 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:37:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JwtETNEG4dzE for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2061A891A for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:37:12 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79456d000001332-69-56605395d0fd
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.27]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AB.AB.04914.59350665; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [150.132.141.77] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:09 +0100
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
References: <09b97044300b550586ac59b692ebbe50@mail.gmail.com> <8FDCD83F-46AE-4394-9570-06549446EB4D@csperkins.org>
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
Message-ID: <56605395.6090703@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:37:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8FDCD83F-46AE-4394-9570-06549446EB4D@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7tO604IQwgwtzuC2WvzzBaHGodSaL xYbVU1gsVt/8wObA4jHt/n02jyVLfjJ5HHoe5HHsw1e2AJYoLpuU1JzMstQifbsErozuh4uZ C1o4KvZ/6GBrYDzP1sXIySEhYCKx7OB7FghbTOLCvfVAcS4OIYHDjBKvti4AKxISWM0o0TSN EcQWFrCQ2PjsK1iDiECCRO+m0+wQNSUSh36vZ+pi5OBgFoiS6NtZBGKyCdhIPF7sB1LBLyAp saFhNzOIzSugLfFp5ld2kBIWARWJA1+jQcKiAjES7zetYoQoEZQ4OfMJ2CJOAUeJ5U8bwY5h Bjpg5vzzjBC2vETz1tnMIGOEBHQlul7GTWAUmoWkexaSjllIOhYwMq9iFC1OLS7OTTcy1kst ykwuLs7P08tLLdnECAzyg1t+6+5gXP3a8RCjAAejEg/vh/L4MCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivFFu CWFCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEeVuYHoQKCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGNOXWp0+ /2aOc+43Ia/EbzknLloJdTYuboze1n+va3vx+6MLTBYIW5bffuO/u9Xre4tk3cyLRd2znFlL /u/1vH9A6y0rZ8zTx2vmW1+9EbqQt5L9m9jEaRKmXd/3zS9LVq/Xn3n1+4EFz18tX7uwyEZl 44q0hO+Xf7DmO8u0T/XmLG6cEzExwV6JpTgj0VCLuag4EQDx8iOlbgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/Gw0UcZ_bi7aVJrKsIviBzhf8Mb4>
Cc: rmcat@ietf.org, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:37:14 -0000
On 2015-11-24 17:27, Colin Perkins wrote: > I’d suggest either updates to the candidate drafts, or email on the list. > >> Assuming Yes. Where shall the outcome of the work be specified ? >> draft-perkins-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-01.txt or new draft > > I view the role of that as being to describe what’s possible in terms of responsiveness of RTCP feedback. It talks about how much feedback can be provided, and how quickly, not what feedback information is needed. The combination of that draft, and requirements from the candidate drafts, will tell us whether RTCP feedback is sufficient, or if it needs some extensions/alternatives. > +1. BR -- Zahed ================================================== ANM ZAHEDUZZAMAN SARKER Ericsson AB Services, Media and Network Features Laboratoriegränd 11 97128 Luleå, Sweden Phone +46 10 717 37 43 Fax +46 920 996 21 SMS/MMS +46 76 115 37 43 zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com www.ericsson.com ==================================================
- [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Stefan Holmer
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Colin Perkins
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Varun Singh
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [rmcat] Generic RTCP feedback message AGAIN Zaheduzzaman Sarker