Re: [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results
Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com> Thu, 25 June 2015 11:06 UTC
Return-Path: <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F16B1A035F for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtK_dWlchPSe for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A19E1A034C for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcsj18 with SMTP id sj18so5616576igc.1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tieto.com; s=google; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=x26Y6hpSlpLigUgqlZvQljWokOfN1/pXvJj2TdJOS84=; b=gajGYyOlm9HBG2U1A/mNZ7wpwVA4fgvJG1H7ZU7SIi7PGAti7+Ra1kKCLaWJc67uyC OURVZXdjhx6Loho4ys5XR07QNfDfjdJvtCVfFkPq+u9V9ilPRlLetRNGcbWo0nh7yKca g9r6wS/YGVqEIYPb3Jc1A0oVyhS8PQnRWRddc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=x26Y6hpSlpLigUgqlZvQljWokOfN1/pXvJj2TdJOS84=; b=luPua5PhkCYn36kezjgMaA3gXXx1T69CEngMXTz7pcWoVsCqS6Pn16eA3WvUMht3vY 1xvYhbVLZtydsGPRYQe7UjCilDeY6DoSOuWRGD1VXJtZcR5HhIikZknzUoblVO2hs+t8 OPt187Hc83Js5sWjJf0MAWgrskUOwnQUtg4T/GZ4+mP/xnjADnxZdd1T2Vtgz8sIDZW7 Lr+fRsMyd3P+8RJYhbzCntarbFar61rkHZ/fUkhZzUaXpxtInrGqvA+gxfgQEgXpVaY5 0o1pIegOmu0ZPODVscylJCdigD02V9uQMEXqtgzLPeVg9fichev40+xMItS9QLAXDUIe tQPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnBKIQuTm4YZBadTVv6AQ40VpXDOVViWgVXeazJM92xf1KSQ3JErtkcJwueAvbDz3V2jDg4jwONjoV+3e8NYu8h2JAMthPR+YInCyl+pd1bhpSSlo=
X-Received: by 10.43.24.134 with SMTP id re6mr24023893icb.74.1435230355235; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <karen.nielsen@tieto.com>
References: <CAEdus3++861yPhsmaiH3nOh9wfN+5CN32vcM8GM+8aDpt5BsEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEdus3++861yPhsmaiH3nOh9wfN+5CN32vcM8GM+8aDpt5BsEw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQF+mXRxXEGJZeRaFMbDVZCe77AAb55hN1Ug
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:05:54 +0200
Message-ID: <6c6269d06a0eaeb03932d3dbb4818516@mail.gmail.com>
To: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51d23507ebca70519559b5a"
X-DomainID: tieto.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/IEaQ1E1Bkwae6h3EcPBOpI4jO8M>
Cc: Stefan Holmer <holmer@google.com>, Cesar Ilharco Magalhaes <magalhaesc@google.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com>, Gaetano Carlucci <gaetano.carlucci@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:06:00 -0000
Hi, As chairs we encourage the wg to look into this work and provide comments and spur discussions. As Stefan writes we have allocated time at the interim for in depth presentations and discussions of this work and indeed there is also the intention to evaluate whether to adopt the work at IETF93. BR, Karen/Mirja *From:* rmcat [mailto:rmcat-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Stefan Holmer *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:50 PM *To:* rmcat WG *Cc:* Harald Alvestrand; Luca De Cicco; Gaetano Carlucci; Cesar Ilharco Magalhaes *Subject:* [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results Hi Everyone, We have been hard at work with a new revision of GCC <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rmcat-congestion> and we are making good progress. The updated draft is not yet ready, but we will make sure to submit it in time for the IETF 93 deadline. Today want to share with you a preliminary version of a comparison between the next (-03) revision of GCC and NADA-06 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhu-rmcat-nada-06>. Our hope is that these results will help in the decision of adopting GCC, so please provide any comments you may have so that we can address them in time for the meeting. The comparison was made using a network simulator <https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/master/webrtc/modules/remote_bitrate_estimator/test/>, with our own implementations of both GCC and NADA <https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/master/webrtc/modules/remote_bitrate_estimator/test/estimators/>. The results are not yet fully reproducible since we haven't yet committed all the necessary changes, but most of it is there. At the interim we plan to also provide emulation results of GCC running in Chrome. Thanks, Stefan, together with César, Harald, Luca and Gaetano
- [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results Stefan Holmer
- Re: [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen