[rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results

Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org> Tue, 23 June 2015 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <holmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A281B2F17 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btpMsV_Ycoix for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8A321B2F13 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrt9 with SMTP id rt9so16973891ieb.2 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=+O/NmxLUPfKOCx9psAq5igLqGM1tjGKK+/tV8LZnVXg=; b=I524gzv60tHRI25S00t0K1b/nAhOAj0AOlfm9nDdtPDf82YNrcfJI6hOlbnQE3zMeh Sh02V7r1EfDSZqAR5sPfUD9yICB2sId19GyOe/n1f3/NDtGU0MEGCD5QCBPxqZnLXcxz qi1h9J1WgjOI00m6cbu9Z8QA9Zr/4nITfzBHSlzmKHzRLfV6eyh2MLpDCKgeowp3ufjc jEIzCFCL+HNJL52saarBTqU/Qwv8wjqi0ozRNmDOcEJnyVuNDwmbscAymDOL3oTlkiUA Zj1q19j6wWeR5W4Hc8QCO+0775SQYwgZ5qZXs+tL32jMbvSRLr+j2xnYPysblSh0yG+w +dEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmyKWAg23cZEWQiccvqfot/3dzsaQvCw5MBPnhuS6vLNDD8EjnqAx7tUF12Q2NgxJzToivY
X-Received: by 10.50.30.138 with SMTP id s10mr3804689igh.3.1435081791356; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:49:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEdus3++861yPhsmaiH3nOh9wfN+5CN32vcM8GM+8aDpt5BsEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: rmcat WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="047d7bdc9f5067f0d305193304db"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/pauCFk1-SjNbVSJ7clphLu2C984>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Luca De Cicco <ldecicco@gmail.com>, Gaetano Carlucci <gaetano.carlucci@gmail.com>, Cesar Ilharco Magalhaes <magalhaesc@google.com>
Subject: [rmcat] GCC / NADA Comparison Results
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:49:57 -0000

Hi Everyone,

We have been hard at work with a new revision of GCC
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rmcat-congestion> and we are
making good progress. The updated draft is not yet ready, but we will make
sure to submit it in time for the IETF 93 deadline.

Today want to share with you a preliminary version of a comparison between
the next (-03) revision of GCC and NADA-06
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhu-rmcat-nada-06>. Our hope is that
these results will help in the decision of adopting GCC, so please provide
any comments you may have so that we can address them in time for the
meeting.

The comparison was made using a network simulator
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/master/webrtc/modules/remote_bitrate_estimator/test/>,
with our own implementations of both GCC and NADA
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/master/webrtc/modules/remote_bitrate_estimator/test/estimators/>.
The results are not yet fully reproducible since we haven't yet committed
all the necessary changes, but most of it is there.

At the interim we plan to also provide emulation results of GCC running in
Chrome.

Thanks,
Stefan, together with César, Harald, Luca and Gaetano